IBM Order Management vs Siebel comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Order Management Hubs category. IBM is ranked #2, while Oracle is ranked #17. IBM holds a 13.2% mindshare in OMH, compared to Oracle’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Order Management

Read 2 IBM Order Management reviews

528 Views
435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Siebel

Read 6 Siebel reviews

19 Views
15 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

IBM Order Management

Siebel

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Order Management and Siebel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Order Management Hubs solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Order Management vs. Siebel Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Order Management vs. Siebel

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Order Management

Ranking in Order Management Hubs

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Siebel

Ranking in Order Management Hubs

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Field Service Management (6th), Product Configuration and Quoting (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Order Management Hubs category, the mindshare of IBM Order Management is 13.2%, down from 24.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Siebel is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Order Management Hubs

Featured Reviews

it_user522132

Senior Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Tracking orders is easy and it is intuitive. Sometimes when the load gets too much, it's a little slow.

It has a very good user interface. It makes my life easy, because I am from the quality testing team, so it's easy for me to track any order. Since I am from Target, I need to track orders; tracking is very easy through the IBM Order Management System. It is extremely intuitive.

Read full review

Mario Treviño Salazar

Solution Architect for New Products and Services at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

We're able to customize the business rules with code and to integrate it with middleware applications to manage the rules externally. The interactions with social networks can’t be managed with it.

Siebel's most valuable feature is the web interface. As far as CRM's go, it's a very flexible solution, and we're able to customize the business rules with code and to integrate it with middleware applications to manage the rules externally. In our case, we've integrated all our BSS and OSS applications with Siebel using TIBCO v5.6. The application itself contains complete functionalities needed to manage the interactions with clients -- quotes, opportunities, and offers. Also, we can register the interactions with our clients. We have another instance of Siebel CRM (7.8) and in that case we have integrated also with Tibco BW 5.9 and we are currently using other products from Tibco for developing the BPM processes related (Tibco iDecisions as BPM).

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Order Management Hubs solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Retailer

13%

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Blue Yonder Order Management vs IBM Order Management

Compared 36% of the time

Manhattan Active Omni vs IBM Order Management

Compared 29% of the time

Yantriks vs IBM Order Management

Compared 20% of the time

Amdocs CES vs IBM Order Management

Compared 16% of the time

More IBM Order Management Competitors

Salesforce CPQ vs Siebel

Compared 62% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Siebel

Compared 38% of the time

More Siebel Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Order Management Hubs

November 2024

Download IBM Order Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Service Management

November 2024

Download Siebel product report

Also Known As

Sterling Commerce Order Management, Sterling Order Management

No data available

Learn More

IBM

Oracle

Overview

IBM Order Management orchestrates cross-channel selling and order orchestration processes across a dynamic business network of customers, suppliers, and partners. IBM Order Management provides robust cross-channel functionality that can intelligently broker orders across many disparate systems, provide a global view of all inventory across the supply chain, and help you make changes to business processes based on changing market conditions.

Information not available

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Telus, Avalara, VolkerHighways, ISE Commerce, Frontline, UniCredit Group

Hover Automotive India, Smiles, Bouygues Telecom, Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, Lawn Tennis Association Boosts Tennis, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

IBM Order Management vs. Siebel

December 2024

Free Report: IBM Order Management vs. Siebel

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Order Management vs. Siebel and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Order Management vs. Siebel report.

See our list of best Order Management Hubs vendors.

We monitor all Order Management Hubs reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.