Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Predictive Analytics vs RapidMiner comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Predictive Analytics
Ranking in Predictive Analytics
20th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RapidMiner
Ranking in Predictive Analytics
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Predictive Analytics category, the mindshare of IBM Predictive Analytics is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RapidMiner is 17.3%, down from 20.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Predictive Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

LE
Good prediction capability for marketing purposes, although it needs to be more flexible
I found it very hard to change the algorithm that is used for prediction and I think that this solution can be more flexible. It looks like more of a black box in some cases and there are few ways to intervene and specify actions. Using IBM Predictive Analytics requires more skill, resources, and training than some other solutions. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see better integration with business solutions so that the data can be more easily accessed.
Rathnam Makam - PeerSpot reviewer
A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models
One challenge I encountered while implementing RapidMiner was the lack of documentation. Since there aren't as many users, finding resources to learn the tool was initially difficult. To overcome this hurdle, I believe RapidMiner could improve by providing more tutorials tailored for new users. I haven't explored the tool's latest version, so I'm unaware of the current features. However, I think it would be beneficial if they could enhance capabilities related to deep neural networks, provide better support for generating UI, and allow for importing and utilizing large language models.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the predictive capability in marketing use cases."
"The solution is stable."
"RapidMiner for Windows is an excellent graphical tool for data science."
"Scalability is not really a concern with RapidMiner. It scales very well and can be used in global implementations."
"What I like about RapidMiner is its all-in-one nature, which allows me to prepare, extract, transform, and load data within the same tool."
"The best part of RapidMiner is efficiency."
"It is easy to use and has a huge community that I can rely on for help. Moreover, it is interactive."
"The data science, collaboration, and IDN are very, very strong."
"RapidMiner is very easy to use."
 

Cons

"Using IBM Predictive Analytics requires more skill, resources, and training than some other solutions."
"I would like to see more integration capabilities."
"Many things in the interface look nice, but they aren't of much use to the operator. It already has lots of variables in there."
"It would be helpful to have some tutorials on communicating with Python."
"In the Mexican or Latin American market, it's kind of pricey."
"The price of this solution should be improved."
"If they could include video tutorials, people would find that quite helpful."
"I would appreciate improvements in automation and customization options to further streamline processes."
"I would like to see all users have access to all of the deep learning models, and that they can be used easily."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"For the university, the cost of the solution is free for the students and teachers."
"The client only has to pay the licensing costs. There are not any maintenance or hidden costs in addition to the license."
"I used an educational license for this solution, which is available free of charge."
"I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately priced, not too high or too low. It's worth the investment."
"Although we don't pay licensing fees because it is being used within the university, my understanding is that the cost is between $5,000 and $10,000 USD per year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
University
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RapidMiner?
RapidMiner is a no-code machine learning tool. I can install it on my local machine and work with smaller datasets. It can also connect to databases, allowing me to build models directly on the dat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RapidMiner?
I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately priced, not too high or too low. It's worth the investment.
What needs improvement with RapidMiner?
The product must provide data-cleaning features. I could not use RapidMiner for data cleaning in one of my projects and had to use Python instead.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Getin Noble Bank S.A., North Pacific Bank Ltd., RightShip, California Franchise Tax Board, Consolidated Communications, Coherent Path Inc., Rossmann Supermarkety Drogeryjne Polska Sp. z o.o., Tennessee Highway Patrol, Banco de Prevision Social, Comptel Corp.
PayPal, Deloitte, eBay, Cisco, Miele, Volkswagen
Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAP, RapidMiner and others in Predictive Analytics. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.