IBM Public Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

IBM Public Cloud and Pivotal Cloud Foundry are competing in the cloud services market. IBM Public Cloud often has an upper hand in pricing and support service, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is strong in offering cloud-native features.

Features: IBM Public Cloud is noted for its compute resources, data management tools, and AI capabilities with a wide range of integration options. Pivotal Cloud Foundry focuses on rapid application development, its CI/CD integration, and platform reliability, offering a strong developer-centric experience for agile development environments.

Room for Improvement: IBM Public Cloud could improve in speed and flexibility of service customization. Some users suggest enhancing user experience and further developing the analytics interface. Enhancing AI tool accessibility could also be beneficial. Pivotal Cloud Foundry might need to address initial deployment complexity, focus on performance optimization in non-Java applications, and improve initial cost management to appeal to more budget-conscious organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Public Cloud offers a unified deployment interface that simplifies integration across different IT environments, supported by proactive customer support. Pivotal Cloud Foundry emphasizes straightforward deployment focused on microservices architecture, providing a productive developer experience. While IBM focuses on integrating diverse tools, Pivotal emphasizes rapid deployment efficiency and robust developer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Public Cloud provides flexible pricing models targeting cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI for large enterprises. Pivotal Cloud Foundry may have higher initial costs due to its comprehensive feature set but offers significant ROI through efficient resource use and reduced time-to-market, contrasting IBM's cost-effective models with Pivotal's focus on enhanced developer productivity for long-term savings.