Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs NMQA QABook comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational ClearQuest
Ranking in Defect Tracking
1st
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (7th)
NMQA QABook
Ranking in Defect Tracking
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Defect Tracking category, the mindshare of IBM Rational ClearQuest is 37.5%, up from 31.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NMQA QABook is 6.3%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Defect Tracking
 

Featured Reviews

it_user541326 - PeerSpot reviewer
Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point numbers.
Customer Service: Customer service has been adequate. Most of the times we've had any issues IBM has been able to provide a solution. We've dealt mostly with customer service representatives in Brazil. Technical Support: Technical support from IBM is pretty good since you can create a PMR with them and they’re very responsible.
Use NMQA QABook?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Defect Tracking solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Rational ClearQuest
QABook
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI