IBM Rational Performance Tester vs SpecFlow comparison

IBM and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. IBM is ranked #23, while Tricentis is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. IBM holds a 1.4% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

124 Views
98 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SpecFlow

Read 4 SpecFlow reviews

347 Views
145 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Performance Te...

SpecFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and SpecFlow are significant tools in software testing. SpecFlow often has the upper hand due to its valuable features despite higher costs.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester is valued for detailed load testing, comprehensive performance analysis, and in-depth insights. SpecFlow is praised for its integration with BDD frameworks, natural language test writing, and Gherkin language support.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester needs a simpler initial setup, more intuitive reporting features, and better documentation. SpecFlow could improve with better documentation, non-.NET environment support, and faster customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester has a steeper learning curve and longer deployment times but responsive customer service. SpecFlow has a straightforward deployment process, though customer service feedback is mixed.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester has justified initial setup costs with robust performance and long-term ROI. SpecFlow's higher pricing is offset by its valuable features and quicker ROI due to reduced test case writing and maintenance time.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 817,457 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SpecFlow

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SpecFlow is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user323943

Netcool Engineer with 10,001+ employees

We can edit captured transactions and organize them by those for which we require performance metrics, but it lacks a set of manuals or guides that would take out some guess work.

It is used to capture and generate HTTP tests. The capture process is very easy. After this, we edited the captured transactions to organize them into the sections or transactions we require performance metrics for (i.e. splash page, user authentication, main pageload, logout, etc.). This editing process is easy to perform with the interface provided in Rational Performance Tester Finally, Rational Performance Tester has an import/export feature that has been extremely useful. We have used it to export our complete test library and import it into another Rational Performance Tester server with no loss or issues. This allows for platform test migrations and backup.

Read full review

KreshenAmourdon

Software Automation Test Engineer at I2era

An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users

In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."

"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

"The initial setup is easy."

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."

Cons

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."

"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."

"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

"SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."

"SpecFlow is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

817,457 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SpecFlow?

One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?

SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SpecFlow?

In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 54% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 35% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow

Compared 61% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs SpecFlow

Compared 22% of the time

TestRail vs SpecFlow

Compared 17% of the time

More SpecFlow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester

November 2024

Download IBM Rational Performance Tester product report

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow

November 2024

Download SpecFlow product report

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester

SpecFlow+

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

Tricentis

Overview

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow

October 2024

Free Report: IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

817,457 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. SpecFlow report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.