Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SpecFlow vs Tricentis qTest comparison

SpecFlow and Tricentis qTest are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. SpecFlow is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while Tricentis qTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7. SpecFlow holds a 1.8% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis qTest’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of SpecFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis qTest users who would recommend it.
SpecFlow
Read 4 SpecFlow reviews
  • 382 Views
  • 160 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Tricentis qTest
Read 16 Tricentis qTest reviews
  • 1,669 Views
  • 1,053 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Tricentis qTest and SpecFlow are two prominent software testing tools, competing in the software testing category. Tricentis qTest appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive test management capabilities.

Features: Tricentis qTest offers extensive test management, automation capabilities, and support for large-scale projects. SpecFlow shines with BDD integrations, .NET framework compatibility, and seamless integration with development processes.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis qTest could benefit from better integration with third-party tools, a more intuitive system for managing test cases, and streamlined workflows. SpecFlow users desire better documentation, a smoother setup process, and enhancements in ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis qTest is praised for its smooth deployment and commendable customer support. SpecFlow has a straightforward deployment but occasionally requires technical knowledge, and customer service receives mixed reviews, with some users seeking quicker resolution times.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis qTest is priced on the higher end but is considered a worthwhile investment due to its robust feature set. SpecFlow, being open-source, offers a cost-effective solution, though additional costs for integrations and commercial support may arise.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow users praise prompt, knowledgeable, and professional customer service, with clear communication and detailed guidance aiding efficient troubleshooting.
No sentiment score available
Tricentis qTest support is responsive and helpful, but users sometimes experience delays and limitations, rating it six out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
SpecFlow needs better reporting, ALM integration, test data management, feature linking, chain testing, and easier setup and automation methods.
Sentiment score
5.2
Tricentis qTest requires improvements in Insights performance, JIRA integration, Defects module robustness, interface design, and report generation.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
SpecFlow is scalable and reliable for various teams, though converting requirements to scenarios can be time-consuming.
Sentiment score
8.2
Tricentis qTest scales well globally, integrates seamlessly with tools, and supports diverse teams with minimal maintenance due to its cloud-based nature.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.8
<p>SpecFlow's tiered pricing includes free Community, paid Professional, and premium Enterprise options, balancing cost with advanced features.</p>
No sentiment score available
Tricentis qTest costs $1,000-$2,000 per license annually, higher than Jira and Zephyr but justified by advanced features.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow is highly rated for stability and reliability, with users noting no bugs, glitches, crashes, or freezing.
Sentiment score
8.3
Tricentis qTest is highly stable with rare downtimes, minor performance issues, and consistently meets user needs with strong ratings.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow enhances programming with Gherkin scenarios, easy setup, stability, risk identification, unit testing, and Microsoft integration.
Sentiment score
8.2
Test automation excels with JIRA integration, ease of use, test case reusability, insightful reporting, and scalability for large projects.
 

Categories and Ranking

SpecFlow
Ranking in Test Management Tools
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis qTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of SpecFlow is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 14.5%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KreshenAmourdon - PeerSpot reviewer
An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users
In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review
Sudipto Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
It doesn't require installation because you can use it through the URL; it's user-friendly and has an excellent reporting feature
The support for Tricentis qTest has room for improvement. The response could be better. There's a feature I want to document on the Tricentis Idea Portal for Tricentis qTest, which I hope to see in the next version of the tool. It's a feature available in Micro Focus where you execute a test, and then on a spec level, you mark it as pass or fail. Then at the overall level, Micro Focus will automatically mark the test as a pass if all steps passed or failed, even if one step failed. However, here in Tricentis qTest, you still need to mark the overall level of the test cases. It's not automated, unlike what you have in Micro Focus. If Tricentis adds that feature in Tricentis qTest, it will make life easier for testers.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Healthcare Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SpecFlow?
One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?
SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SpecFlow?
In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tricentis qTest?
I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?
Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?
The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved. Some of the modules appear to be loosely connected, but despite these aspects, our overall expe...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow
Compared 61% of the time
TestRail vs SpecFlow Logo
TestRail vs SpecFlow
Compared 18% of the time
More SpecFlow Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 25% of the time
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Tricentis qTest Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 23% of the time
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest Logo
TestRail vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 14% of the time
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest Logo
Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 8% of the time
PractiTest vs Tricentis qTest Logo
PractiTest vs Tricentis qTest
Compared 3% of the time
More Tricentis qTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow
October 2024
SpecFlow reportDownload SpecFlow product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
October 2024
Tricentis qTest reportDownload Tricentis qTest product report
 

Also Known As

SpecFlow+
qTest
 

Learn More

Tricentis
Tricentis
 

Overview

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality. 

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest
October 2024
Free Report: SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest
Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SpecFlow vs. Tricentis qTest report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.