Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tricentis qTest Logo

Top 10 Tricentis qTest Alternatives

Vendor: Tricentis
4.2 out of 5
499 followers
Post review

Top Tricentis qTest Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tricentis qTest based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include TFS, OpenText ALM / Quality Center, and TestRail. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Tricentis Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tricentis, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Tricentis qTest Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
Tricentis qTest Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
TFS provides strong integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, valuable for those invested in Microsoft tools, but lacks advanced test automation and reporting. In comparison, Tricentis qTest excels in automation and comprehensive management, although it needs better integration and a more user-friendly interface.
Download TFS vs. Tricentis qTest Report
TFS has an affordable setup cost while Tricentis qTest offers a more comprehensive suite at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has an affordable setup cost while Tricentis qTest offers a more comprehensive suite at a higher initial expense.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
4.0 out of 5
OpenText ALM / Quality Center excels in requirements management and defect tracking with strong enterprise performance. In comparison, Tricentis qTest offers agile testing support and intuitive workflows. Tricentis qTest deploys easily with responsive support, whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center has higher setup costs but long-term enterprise value.
Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Tricentis qTest Report
OpenText ALM/Quality Center generally involves a higher initial setup cost, while Tricentis qTest offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ALM/Quality Center generally involves a higher initial setup cost, while Tricentis qTest offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Tricentis qTest Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
Tricentis qTest Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
TestRail offers a robust reporting system and simple deployment with competitive pricing. In comparison, Tricentis qTest has advanced automation capabilities and extensive features suited for complex testing environments. Users prefer TestRail's quick support, while Tricentis qTest's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download TestRail vs. Tricentis qTest Report
TestRail offers a lower setup cost compared to Tricentis qTest, making it more affordable for initial implementation. Tricentis qTest, while having a higher setup cost, provides a more robust set of advanced features for comprehensive test management.
View comparison
Pricing
TestRail offers a lower setup cost compared to Tricentis qTest, making it more affordable for initial implementation. Tricentis qTest, while having a higher setup cost, provides a more robust set of advanced features for comprehensive test management.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Zephyr Enterprise
3.9 out of 5
Tricentis qTest Logo
Zephyr Enterprise
3.9 out of 5
For test management, Tricentis qTest offers robust planning, execution, and reporting features that streamline processes. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise excels in Jira integration and advanced test automation. While qTest is praised for ease of deployment, Zephyr requires more setup but offers comprehensive capabilities.
Download Tricentis qTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Tricentis qTest presents a straightforward setup cost structure; Zephyr Enterprise, on the other hand, involves a more complex and higher initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis qTest presents a straightforward setup cost structure; Zephyr Enterprise, on the other hand, involves a more complex and higher initial setup investment.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional
4.2 out of 5
Visual Studio Test Professional is preferred for its integration with Microsoft tools and ease of deployment, making it suitable for users seeking prompt customer service and straightforward setup. In comparison, Tricentis qTest offers extensive test case management and superior integration with CI/CD tools, appealing to those valuing comprehensive features despite higher setup costs.
Download Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report
Visual Studio Test Professional has a lower setup cost compared to Tricentis qTest, which tends to be higher. The difference in setup costs may significantly impact the overall budget for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Visual Studio Test Professional has a lower setup cost compared to Tricentis qTest, which tends to be higher. The difference in setup costs may significantly impact the overall budget for each solution.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
Tricentis qTest Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
Helix ALM offers traceability and integration capabilities and is competitively priced with good support. In comparison, Tricentis qTest has robust test management and automation features justifying its higher cost. Helix ALM and qTest both excel in deployment, but Helix ALM edges in support quality.
Download Helix ALM vs. Tricentis qTest Report
Helix ALM has a lower setup cost, while Tricentis qTest is higher in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Helix ALM has a lower setup cost, while Tricentis qTest is higher in initial expenses.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
Panaya Test Dynamix
4.3 out of 5
Tricentis qTest stands out with its robust test management and integration capabilities, while Panaya Test Dynamix excels with impact analysis and comprehensive regression testing. Tricentis qTest has better pricing and support; in comparison, Panaya Test Dynamix offers rich features, justifying its higher cost.
Download Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis qTest Report
Tricentis qTest has a lower setup cost while Panaya Test Dynamix offers more comprehensive setup support. Tricentis qTest targets cost efficiency, Panaya Test Dynamix focuses on extensive assistance.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis qTest has a lower setup cost while Panaya Test Dynamix offers more comprehensive setup support. Tricentis qTest targets cost efficiency, Panaya Test Dynamix focuses on extensive assistance.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management
3.8 out of 5

IBM Engineering Test Management appeals to tech buyers for its strong traceability and integration capabilities, along with excellent customer service. In comparison, Tricentis qTest's comprehensive test management, automation integration, and ease of deployment justify its higher price for many users.

Download IBM Engineering Test Management vs. Tricentis qTest Report
IBM Engineering Test Management involves a significant initial setup cost, while the setup cost for Tricentis qTest is relatively lower, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management involves a significant initial setup cost, while the setup cost for Tricentis qTest is relatively lower, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Tricentis qTest Logo
PractiTest
4.4 out of 5
Tricentis qTest Logo
PractiTest
4.4 out of 5
Tricentis qTest excels in feature richness and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for complex testing needs. In comparison, PractiTest stands out for its ease of use and intuitive design, offering smooth deployment and reliable support, appealing to those who prioritize user-friendliness.
Download PractiTest vs. Tricentis qTest Report
Tricentis qTest has a higher setup cost, whereas PractiTest offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making it a cost-effective choice for smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis qTest has a higher setup cost, whereas PractiTest offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making it a cost-effective choice for smaller teams.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
Inflectra SpiraTest
3.7 out of 5
Inflectra SpiraTest attracts buyers with its cost-effectiveness and excellent support, offering seamless integration and solid test management. In comparison, Tricentis qTest is ideal for those needing superior test automation and comprehensive reporting features, with its higher price justified by advanced options.
Download Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Tricentis qTest Report
Inflectra SpiraTest offers a straightforward setup process, while Tricentis qTest has a more complex and potentially costly initial implementation. SpiraTest's simplicity contrasts with qTest's extensive configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Inflectra SpiraTest offers a straightforward setup process, while Tricentis qTest has a more complex and potentially costly initial implementation. SpiraTest's simplicity contrasts with qTest's extensive configuration requirements.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
3.6 out of 5
Tricentis qTest offers robust test automation and comprehensive reporting capabilities. In comparison, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira excels in seamless integration with Jira and customizable workflows, making it more suitable for project management. Installers find Tricentis efficient for automation, while Adaptavist appeals through its integration strengths.
Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Tricentis qTest Report
Tricentis qTest incurs a higher setup cost compared to Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis qTest incurs a higher setup cost compared to Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Tricentis qTest Logo
Tricentis qTest Logo
QMetry Test Management
3.0 out of 5

QMetry is a suite of most comprehensive test management products to provide agile testing teams innovative technology platforms to deploy better Quality Software faster with confidence. It has more than 20 integrations. QMetry brand is trusted by 400+ customers globally across many industries including Finance, Healthcare Services, Travel & Hospitality, Retail, Education and High Technology.

QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users.
View comparison
Pricing
QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users.

Related categories

Test Management Tools
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Functional Testing Tools