Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs Orchestrated Service Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Orchestrated Service Virtua...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is 8.1%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Orchestrated Service Virtualization is 6.1%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

it_user549324 - PeerSpot reviewer
I would recommend it due to the robust infrastructure implementation and good technical support supporting standards
The main feature of the product is to support you with service virtualization for various components. However, some peripheral features need vast improvement, namely the reporting and the dashboard areas. I work very closely with the IBM product management team, and I know that in the next release, they are going to drop in some of these reporting features.
reviewer949782 - PeerSpot reviewer
Live connectivity benefits but is lacking customization options
Our primary use of the solution is for mocking of API codes One feature we like is the live connectivity of the product. In other words, you can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data. We haven't used the product…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."
"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."
"You can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."
 

Cons

"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."
"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS."
"The initial setup was complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features."
"The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."
"The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

Green Hat, IBM RTVS
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Qantas Airways 
MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Allianz, Siemens, Bosch, Commerz Real, Toyota
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, SmartBear, OpenText and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.