IBM Security Network IPS vs Vectra AI comparison

IBM and Vectra AI are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #23, while Vectra AI is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.6% mindshare in ID, compared to Vectra AI’s 11.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Vectra AI users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Network IPS

Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews

243 Views
164 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Vectra AI

Read 45 Vectra AI reviews

5,133 Views
2,624 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

IBM Security Network IPS

Vectra AI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Security Network IPS and Vectra AI compete in the network security space. IBM Security Network IPS has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer service, while Vectra AI excels in advanced AI-driven threat detection.

Features: IBM Security Network IPS offers comprehensive intrusion prevention, threat intelligence integration, and real-time attack prevention. It supports centralized management via IBM SiteProtector, ensuring smooth integration with transaction systems. Vectra AI utilizes AI-driven technology for proactive threat detection and response, employing machine learning to identify threats early. Its feature set includes Cognito Recall and Cognito Detect, providing network visibility and aggregated risk scores for prioritizing threats efficiently.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Network IPS could enhance its AI capabilities and improve analytical sophistication to match its competitors. Further development in threat detection precision and user interface could benefit IBM. Vectra AI could streamline its initial setup process and reduce dependency on user intervention for complex configurations. Efforts to minimize false positives and simplify fault rectification processes would enhance its overall performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Network IPS is appreciated for its straightforward deployment and extensive customer service, aiding in easy implementation. Vectra AI, while involving a more complex setup due to its advanced features, provides substantial support to overcome these complexities. IBM’s simplistic installation is a strong point, whereas Vectra's thorough post-deployment service optimizes its AI functionality.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Network IPS is known for a favorable pricing model and promising ROI, catering to various budgetary needs. Vectra AI, despite higher initial costs, delivers a significant long-term security ROI with its advanced threat detection, deemed worthwhile for organizations seeking innovation. Balancing upfront costs with cutting-edge features, Vectra provides substantial value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vectra AI

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (15th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (10th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vectra AI is 11.3%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra

Project & Program manager at Shell Grp

User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive

Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.

Read full review

Mohammad Alkurdi

Owner at Fortibits

Innovative detection features enhance monitoring

The advantages of the integration are not entirely out-of-the-box. You have to do it manually. When I'm doing tier response, an out-of-the-box solution is not available. You need to have a Linux server, and from the Linux server, you must perform AI tasks, and there is a lot to be handled in the back end. This is a major consideration about them. The recall feature, if it can be placed in some areas instead of the cloud, and charged for, would be better. Recall the storage where you watch all the traffic, and you can recall it and try to analyze it in the back end. It’s cloud-based. If they offer it on-prem, it would be better. I think they have a solution, but I have never tested it, to be honest with you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is simple."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

"Vectra AI generates relevant information."

"The key feature for me for Detect for Office 365 is that it can also concentrate all the information and detection at one point, the same as the network solution does. This is the key feature for me because, while accessing data from Office 365 is possible using Microsoft interfaces, they are not really user-friendly and are quite confusing to use. But Detect for Office 365 is aggregating all the info, and it's only the interesting stuff."

"The packet-capturing feature is very useful."

"We often use the new feature to create PCAP files from the whole data traffic. It makes it much easier to find network problems such as whether the server is responding to a request. It has nothing to do with security, but it helps a lot to find other problems."

"Scalability wise, we have many sensors, and Vectra AI seems to handle them all very well."

"One of the most valuable features of the platform is its ability to provide you with aggregated risk scores based on impact and certainty of threats being detected. This is both applied to individual and host detections. This is important because it enables us to use this platform to prioritize the most likely imminent threats. So, it reduces alert fatigue follow ups for security operation center analysts. It also provides us with an ability to prioritize limited resources."

"Using this tool for automation has provided more benefits to our processes."

"What I like best about Vectra AI is that it alerts you about suspicious activities."

More Vectra AI pros

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."

"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."

"I would like to see a bit more strategic metrics instead of technical data. Information that I could show to my executive management team or board would be valuable."

"The rules for threats are not always precise and Vectra AI should improve this."

"The false positives and the tuning side of it is something that could use improvement. But that could be from our side."

"The solution has not reduced the security analyst workload in our organization because we still need to SIEM. Unfortunately, while Vectra, for us, is a brilliant tool for network investigations, giving wonderful visibility, it doesn't go the whole way to replace our SIEM that is needed for compliance. So, I still have the same amount of alerting and logging that I did before. It gives us more defined ability to see incidents, but it doesn't give us enough information to satisfy a PCI or 27001 audit."

"I'd like to be able to get granular reports and to be able to output them into formats that are customizable and more useful. The reporting GUI is lacking."

"Vectra Recall could be utilized much more, and I'm seeing some indications of that today with the investigative components. I use the Visualize feature to visualize components and dashboards a lot. I'm interested in new ways to build automated searches or having them leveraged already from Vectra."

"Some of the customization could be improved. Everything is provided for you as an easy solution to use, but working with it and doing specific development could be worked on a bit more in the scope of an incident response team."

"The advantages of the integration are not entirely out-of-the-box. You have to do it manually."

More Vectra AI cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."

"My company pays for the Vectra AI licensing fee yearly. I know the figure because my company recently renewed the license, and it's okay, at least for the financial sector."

"Vectra's licensing model could scale to our research network, which has multiple, 100-gigabit links."

"From a pricing perspective, they are very commercially competitive. From a licensing perspective, just be conscious that some of their future cloud solutions come with additional subscriptions. Also, if you're outside of the US, you will get charged freight for the device back to your country."

"At the time of purchase, we found the pricing acceptable. We had an urgency to get something in place because we had a minor breach that occurred at the tail end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017. This indicated we had a lack of ability to detect things on the network. Hence, why we moved quickly to get into the tool in place. We found things like Bitcoin mining and botnets which we closed quickly. In that regard, it was worth the money."

"Vectra's pricing is too high. All schools will not be able to afford it. Vectra will only end up targeting higher education and higher value independence purely because of the price. A lot of schools would love to have a product like Vectra AI, but they simply can't because they struggle to even pay the high E5 licensing from Microsoft. When you're up against that, Vectra AI is never going to be within the sector's price range."

"The solution is low-cost and affordable."

"From a licensing perspective, the Vectra detect platform is pretty doable. Also, the hardware prices are nothing that we're not used to. The stream part is a little overpriced compared to the detect part. The reason is that you need to stream data to detect events anyway, so the data is in there. The only thing that's not available is the UI to be able to look at the stream data, which is also on the appliances but is just not activated. That's mainly the thing that we want to improve on."

"There are additional features that can be purchased in addition to the standard licensing fee, such as Cognito Recall and Stream."

More Vectra AI pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?

The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Vectra AI?

The solution is currently used as a central threat detection and response system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vectra AI?

It is very acceptable when you compare it with Darktrace, for example.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Darktrace vs Vectra AI

Compared 32% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Vectra AI

Compared 11% of the time

Corelight vs Vectra AI

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Vectra AI

Compared 6% of the time

Arista NDR vs Vectra AI

Compared 6% of the time

More Vectra AI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

April 2025

Download IBM Security Network IPS product report

Buyer's Guide

Vectra AI

March 2025

Download Vectra AI product report

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX

Vectra Networks, Vectra AI NDR

Overview

IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.

IBM

Vectra AI is used for detecting network anomalies and potential malicious activities, providing visibility into network traffic and enhancing threat detection across environments.

Organizations deploy Vectra AI mainly on-premises with additional cloud components. It helps with compliance, incident response, security monitoring, detecting insider threats, and correlating network events. Vectra AI captures and enriches network metadata, provides detailed dashboards, reduces false positives, and supports cross-environment behavioral analysis to enhance threat detection and prioritization. While valued for its high accuracy and alert aggregation, it has room for improvement in UI/UX, packet management, and integration with SIEMs and other tools. It is noted for expensive pricing and limited proactive threat response features.

What are Vectra AI's most valuable features?

High accuracy in identifying threat locations
Aggregation of alerts into single incidents
24/7 threat detection
Visibility into the entire attack lifecycle
Risk score aggregation
Effective triaging of alerts
Integration with other tools

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced threat detection and prioritization
Comprehensive network visibility
Reduction in false positives
Better incident response capabilities
Improved compliance monitoring

In specific industries, Vectra AI is deployed to monitor complex networks and alleviate challenges in threat detection. It is particularly effective in sectors requiring stringent compliance and security measures, offering insights and capabilities crucial for protecting sensitive data and maintaining operational integrity.

Vectra AI

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre

Tribune Media Group, Barry University, Aruba Networks, Good Technology, Riverbed, Santa Clara University, Securities Exchange, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. Vectra AI report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.