IBM Storage Protect vs Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] comparison

IBM and Veeam Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 87% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Veeam Software users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 4 IBM Storage Protect reviews

5,686 Views
4,776 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

Read 23 Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Veeam Agent for Linux and IBM Storage Protect are competing in the data protection software category. Veeam Agent for Linux is seen as more cost-effective and efficient for specific machine licensing, which gives it an upper hand in pricing-related comparisons.

Features: Veeam Agent for Linux supports image-based backups with capabilities for both entire disk and file-level restoration. It offers quick market deployment and is well-suited for non-virtualized environments. Veeam provides reliable integration with VMware for virtual machine compatibility. IBM Storage Protect offers incremental-forever backup, allowing continuous data increment backups after an initial full copy. Its inline deduplication and compression help in significant data reduction. The product supports a wide range of platforms and databases, making it suitable for various enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Veeam Agent for Linux users report challenges with license merging and suggest improvements in this area. Enhancements in managing complex environments would be beneficial. Users seek better support for physical machines that are not running Linux. IBM Storage Protect is noted for its complex pricing model, which may deter smaller businesses. Users express a need for simplified operations and better documentation for configuration tasks. The initial setup process could be more straightforward to improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veeam Agent for Linux is praised for its ease of installation and deployment, with user-friendly interfaces. It integrates well with Veeam Backup & Replication for streamlined management. IBM Storage Protect's deployment is seen as more challenging due to its complexity, but its robust customer service is valued for supporting extensive configurations and integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Veeam Agent for Linux is considered affordable, with its licensing tailored to individual machines rather than full servers or processors, leading to a favorable ROI for businesses focusing on cost savings. IBM Storage Protect is generally more expensive, using a capacity-based licensing model that may offer value for larger enterprises but could be less accessible for smaller businesses. Tiered licensing options are available, yet its initial pricing remains higher compared to Veeam.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (12th)

Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2787573

Interim Head of Infrastructure at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Backup coverage has supported immutable protection and now needs a more modern, intuitive interface

IBM Storage Protect is from a previous generation of backup software. In those days, backup software was complex in setting up and complex to manage. The new software, such as Rubrik, is very easy to use and more relatable to younger engineers because its interface design is more similar to Office 365 and the newer controls and labels that we are accustomed to. The difficulty that we now have with IBM Storage Protect is that for this day and age, compared to other products that are out there, it seems complex. If we look back 15 years ago, all enterprise class backup software was complex, so IBM was not any different. However, many of these older systems, such as Commvault, still have the same complaint that they are very complex because they have tried to keep that same interface and the same way it works. This suits them, but it probably needed a complete overhaul to bring it into the ease of use that we have with modern software. However, that upgrade has not been done. IBM Storage Protect has not been upgraded into a modern platform. It still looks a legacy platform.

Read full review

David Villota

EMEA Hosting Engineer at Yanfeng Automotive

Reliable and issue-free with a helpful onboarding wizard

The solution has been installed on Linux machines. The solution is issue-free. We are happy with it. The solution has been stable and reliable. It is scalable. My understanding the setup is pretty straightforward and that the onboarding wizard is pretty easy to follow. I've never had to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has increased our security, scalability, and high availability."

"It's very robust and has been on the market for a long time."

"It is a very mature product."

"The business value comes from the capability to overcome data losses."

"Overall, my experience with the solution is very positive, and I rate it a 9 out of 10."

"The solution is very stable. It is one of the most important features that we look for in a product before putting it into the market and when establishing a strategy with our customers."

"Incremental backup is highly valuable as it allows for significant time and cost savings."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that IBM Spectrum Protect is highly integrated with IBM ESS. In addition, it allows us to back up our virtual servers directly to take VM snapshots. It runs on Linux as well."

More IBM Storage Protect pros

"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."

"It's simple to use."

"The really amazing feature about Veeam Agent is that when you're using the central deployment model, you can actually use the instant VM recovery feature, which is really a pain point that I find some days."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to pick up individual files."

"It's stable and reliable."

"The technical support is good."

"The solution is very simple. Management of the platform is so simple that we don't need to have any training to deploy this solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration with Veeam Backup & Replication console."

More Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] pros

Cons

"It's difficult in terms of the configuration at set up. In our case, it required another admin, one person dedicated to the backup."

"We cannot take VMware backups for our banking data center environment."

"The user interface (UI) for the admin is still not good. It is way too complicated to manage the product, as we still need to use command line. IBM launched the Operations Center (OC), but there are still functions lacking, especially since we cannot manage all our scheduled tasks by using the GUI."

"The deduplication must be perfect, and thus should be improved."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The stability could be improved."

"There could be various client systems and process integration included in the product."

"We are not so happy with the technical support because dealing with them is not easy. We have a very complicated environment, therefore I understand for a support person that it is not easy to troubleshoot it."

More IBM Storage Protect cons

"The integration needs improvement."

"The pricing could be lowered if possible."

"One problem in Veeam Agent for Linux is that you can't use your license for all your machines because you don't have a virtual machine, so if you're going to add machines and scale, you'd need to pay extra."

"There isn't much to improve. They just need to follow the trend or the development of other Linux products. Follow in terms of making the product compatible with new versions of Linux. They just need to include as many versions for Linux as possible."

"We are currently waiting for the continuous backup process."

"In the next version, I would like to see an increase in the locations online. I have found that other products have good pickup location."

"It could use deduplication features."

"It would be much better if more applications were supported on the Linux side. For example, their agent for Windows not only can back up the Windows machine, but it can also back up Active Directory for granular restore, SQL servers, Exchange, Oracle, SharePoint, etc. When it comes to Linux, only Oracle databases are supported. There are workarounds, though."

More Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not cheap."

"We worked our licensing into a capacity model, which is nice. Now, everything is much simpler to manage from a licensing perspective."

"Regarding retro-compatibility of the product between versions, your data is always available and the ROI is unquestionable."

"The solution is expensive."

"IBM provides an open license policy, which is more like a gentlemen's agreement."

"It can be perceived as expensive since it is designed for enterprise use."

"The licensing fees are on a yearly basis, which for us it is about R400,000 (approximately $27,000 USD)."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is not cost-effective, and ten is cost-effective."

More IBM Storage Protect pricing and cost advice

"Licensing costs are monthly."

"Licensing costs are $300,000 USD yearly, and we pay for three years at a time."

"The costing is very competitive."

"We have purchased a license to use Veeam Agent for Linux and the additional support. The overall cost of Veeam Agent for Linux is expensive."

"There's the principal license for Veeam Agent for Linux, and then you need to buy additional licenses for your machines."

"It's a subscription based license, which is started on a yearly basis. Currently the licensing is split between three editions: standard, enterprise, and enterprise plus. As long as you check the comparison between the additions and make sure that you have what you need, there are no extra costs with Veeam."

"Veeam Agent is one of the cheapest products in the market."

"Price-wise it's good."

More Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Photography Company

33%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	95

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

I do not know the current licensing cost for IBM Storage Protect and how we get our support because our licensing model is not quite standard. We do not buy IBM Storage Protect direct from IBM. We ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 8% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Microsoft DPM vs Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

Compared 55% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

Compared 45% of the time

More Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect

January 2026

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL]

January 2026

Download Veeam Agent for Linux [EOL] product report

Also Known As

IBM Spectrum Discover

No data available

Overview

IBM Storage Protect offers data protection and management to secure critical business information efficiently. It's designed to be a scalable and flexible solution for data backup, recovery, and archive needs in complex IT environments.

IBM Storage Protect delivers comprehensive data protection by integrating backup, recovery, and archiving functionalities. It supports a range of workloads and infrastructures, from on-premises to cloud environments, facilitating efficient data management. Its platform provides seamless scalability to meet evolving business needs, underpinned by reliable security measures. Organizations leverage its capabilities to ensure business continuity and minimize data loss risks, making it vital in a data-driven world.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Advanced Data Protection: Offers robust encryption and data integrity for secure backup processes.
Scalability: Grows with your data demands, supporting large data volumes without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud platforms, enhancing backup strategies with hybrid options.
Automated Operations: Simplifies management tasks with automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs by optimizing backup processes and data retention strategies.
Data Safety: Ensures data accessibility and integrity during recovery efforts, building trust in data protection strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Boosts productivity through streamlined and automated backup management workflows.
Compliance Readiness: Helps maintain compliance with data protection regulations by providing thorough reporting and audit trails.

Industries like finance and healthcare implement IBM Storage Protect to safeguard sensitive information against threats. In financial services, it's crucial for maintaining client data confidentiality, while healthcare institutions use it to protect patient records, ensuring both accessibility and compliance with regulations.

IBM

Veeam Agent for Linux is a simple backup agent that’s designed to ensure the Availability of your Linux installations, both on‑premises and in the public cloud. Veeam Agent for Linux’s built‑in integration with Veeam Backup & Replication allows you to leverage your Veeam backup repositories and get your on‑premises backups off site.

https://www.veeam.com/linux-cloud-server-backup-agent.html

Veeam Software

Sample Customers

CEMEX

ContinuitySA, Industrial Scientific

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.