IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. IBM is ranked #11, while Broadcom is ranked #13. IBM holds a 3.0% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Read 4 IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact reviews

308 Views
185 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

205 Views
125 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing in the IT operations management domain. IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact has an edge with superior pricing and support, though OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is appreciated for its comprehensive feature set, making it worth the higher cost for its automation and monitoring efficiencies.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact offers strong event automation and integration capabilities, facilitating effective incident response and service management. Its powerful tool provides easy integration with other models like Oracle and external systems, ensuring effective event management. The solution is praised for its inherent ISPF APA support, which enhances integration capabilities. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence stands out for its advanced workload automation and robust monitoring features, providing enhanced operational efficiency. The product offers flexibility with command rules, MSF, RDF Tables, and SSM, which synchronizes tasks. Its ability to run complex tasks and perform automatic IPL and shutdown with minimal intervention ensures reliability.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact could benefit from enhanced flexibility in configuration and ad hoc automation capabilities, better scalability to accommodate larger enterprise needs, and a more intuitive user interface for improved user experience. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence could improve by simplifying its initial configuration process, increasing ease of integration with third-party databases, and refining its user interface to make it more user-friendly for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact offers a straightforward deployment model with extensive customer support, ensuring a smooth implementation process. Its simpler initial setup gives it an ease advantage. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides a solid deployment framework but may require more initial configuration efforts. Nevertheless, both products deliver high-quality customer service to support users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact presents an affordable setup cost with a competitive ROI due to its integration capabilities and comprehensive features. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reflects a higher initial cost; however, this investment is justified through its enhanced capabilities, offering greater ROI potential for enterprises focusing on maximizing automation and monitoring efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Ranking in Event Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact is 3.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Vijay-Daniel

Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports APA through ISPF and lets us easily integrate with other apps for ticketing purposes

For improvement, I'd say the dashboard and the overall GUI could use some work. Although, I don't think that there's much improvement that Netcool really needs to achieve in this area, because when we're talking GUI, Impact is able to integrate with any third-party system and it comes with ISPF APA. It's more beneficial than Netcool/OMNIbus in this respect, and it's quite easy to handle. Some statistics around the products would also be nice. For example, to see how it performs. So when the bulk copy has been processed by Impact, through a kind of dashboard, it could indicate to the user: ""This many events have been process this many times, and this particular event may cause trouble. This many events are in testing, etc." Basically, I'd like more visibility into the details and particulars through Impact itself, so that we can take action on what's happening, and we can automate. For instance, we could maybe send the events to some kind of server or monitoring program, and perform automation on them.

Read full review

it_user351621

IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.

One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product allows us to make use of open-source products, including running Java code."

"The most valuable feature that comes with Netcool/Impact is the ISPF APA support. It is inherent to Netcool/Impact, so I can use the ISPF of any other product, which I can invoke and consume through Impact, and do integrations, which is great. I run the Netcool desktop application so I can integrate with other applications in the ticketing system. It's a great ability being able to invoke ISPF and integrate."

"It is easy to integrate with other models such as Oracle, other systems, external systems, and to reach events."

"The solution is great at being able to fetch almost any kind of file."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"I do not have to keep recordings. It is there and is proactive. It helps the operators, human editors, and me."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."

"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"For improvement, I'd say the dashboard and the overall GUI could use some work. Although, I don't think that there's much improvement that Netcool really needs to achieve in this area, because when we're talking GUI, Impact is able to integrate with any third-party system and it comes with ISPF APA. It's more beneficial than Netcool/OMNIbus in this respect, and it's quite easy to handle."

"IBM is not investing in the development of the on-premise version of this solution."

"Stability-wise, this product needs to be improved."

"The solution is somewhat complicated. It's not exactly straightforward."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing of IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact depends on the number of nodes on the element that you are monitoring."

"The licensing is yearly, and although I'm happy with the pricing I do think it could be better."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Logistics Company

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact Competitors

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 100% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

April 2025

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact product report

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

March 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool Impact

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact is an enterprise and network management software that automates the support of business-critical functions. The software helps to enrich events with business context, provides an integrated view of data from multiple sources in context and enables custom automations.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)

Tieto

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.