Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infraon IMS vs Loom Systems comparison

EverestIMS and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. EverestIMS is ranked #60, while ServiceNow is ranked #64. EverestIMS holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.
Infraon IMS
Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews
  • 368 Views
  • 187 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Loom Systems
Read 4 Loom Systems reviews
  • 285 Views
  • 175 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Infraon IMS compete in IT operations management. While Loom Systems is praised for its pricing and support, Infraon IMS emerges as the superior choice because of its comprehensive feature set, which justifies the investment.

Features: Loom Systems provides AI-driven analytics, proactive IT issue resolution, and enhanced operational efficiency. Infraon IMS offers extensive monitoring, advanced automation capabilities, and an integrated IT management approach.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems could benefit from increased customization options, broader feature coverage, and a more scalable solution. Infraon IMS might improve with a reduction in deployment complexity, enhanced user interface design, and more budget-friendly pricing options for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS features a modular deployment model that supports customization and is paired with responsive customer service. Loom Systems, despite its swift deployment methods, uses a standardized implementation approach that may limit customization.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems features a lower setup cost, leading to quicker ROI through efficient problem-solving. Infraon IMS demands a higher initial cost but promises a substantial ROI thanks to its vast functionality and comprehensive IT management features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
60th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (87th), Server Monitoring (28th), Cloud Monitoring Software (44th)
Loom Systems
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
64th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization
The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.
Read full review
Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident
What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."
"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."
"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."
"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."
"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."
"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."
"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."
"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."
"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."
"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."
"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."
"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."
 

Cons

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."
"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."
"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."
"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."
"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."
"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."
"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."
"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."
"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"
"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."
"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."
"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
22%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS
Compared 39% of the time
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS Logo
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS
Compared 33% of the time
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS Logo
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS
Compared 29% of the time
More Infraon IMS Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS
April 2025
Infraon IMS reportDownload Infraon IMS product report
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2025
Loom Systems reportDownload Loom Systems product report
 

Also Known As

Everest IMS
No data available
 

Overview

Infraon IMS is used for monitoring network status, managing critical IT infrastructure, and ensuring connectivity. It helps organizations automate processes, gain network insights, and manage firewalls in private and cloud environments.

Infraon IMS is designed to assist in monitoring leased lines, switches, data center services, and devices across different environments. It provides alerts, manages assets, supports ITSM rules, and handles ticketing and incident management. With its comprehensive reporting on uptime, downtime, and memory utilization, Infraon IMS delivers detailed insights facilitating efficient infrastructure management. The platform integrates seamlessly with various systems and simplifies operations through real-time network monitoring, customizable reports, and a role-based access control system.

What are Infraon IMS's key features?
  • Stable Performance: Ensures reliability and efficiency in monitoring and management tasks.
  • Ease of Customization: Allows adjustments to meet specific requirements.
  • Real-Time Dashboards: Enhances usability for non-technical users through intuitive interfaces.
  • Role-Based Access: Facilitates secure, controlled management.
  • Integration Capabilities: Streamlines operations with various platforms.
  • Alerting Mechanisms: Improves incident response with timely notifications.
  • Workflow Automation: Simplifies and accelerates routine processes.
  • Graphical User Interface: Increases user-friendliness and insight accessibility.
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
  • Automated Processes: Reduces manual effort, increasing efficiency.
  • Network Insights: Provides detailed data for proactive management.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers valuable information for decision-making.
  • Enhanced Security: Manages firewalls and links to ensure robust security.

Infraon IMS is implemented across diverse industries to manage and monitor IT infrastructures, from small to large-scale environments. It is especially beneficial in sectors needing reliable connectivity and efficient incident management, such as telecommunications, finance, and cloud service providers. The platform aids these industries in maintaining operational continuity and optimizing resource allocation.

EverestIMS
Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.
ServiceNow
 

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
March 2025
Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.