Invicti vs Qwiet AI comparison

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

"The platform is stable."

"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

"Asset scanning could be better. Once, it couldn't scan assets, and the issue was strange. The price doesn't fit the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"It is competitive in the security market."