Invicti vs Qwiet AI comparison

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"Invicti is a good product, and its API testing is also good."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."