Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Invicti is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. Invicti holds a 8.8% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

4,405 Views
1,101 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 20 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

2,311 Views
878 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Invicti

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Invicti and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are both competitive application security solutions focusing on identifying and remediating vulnerabilities. Rapid7 InsightAppSec may have an edge due to its advanced integration capabilities and analytics, appealing to organizations that prioritize these features.

Features: Invicti combines deep scanning capabilities with automation, helping to streamline vulnerability management. It excels in accuracy, automation, and provides proof-based scanning to reduce false positives. Rapid7 InsightAppSec integrates seamlessly with various DevOps tools and is noted for providing detailed security insights thanks to its advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could work on simplifying its manual configuration process to enhance user experience. Speed optimization for full scans would be beneficial, as some users experience delays. Better integration with certain tools could also broaden its appeal. Rapid7 InsightAppSec might refine its user interface to enhance usability. Addressing occasional issues with report export functionalities could improve efficiency. Additionally, reducing initial costs would make it more accessible to a broader range of organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightAppSec offers a cloud-based deployment model with excellent customer support, including comprehensive documentation. Users appreciate the streamlined deployment, particularly when needing fast implementation. Invicti provides flexibility with both cloud and on-premises solutions, supported by dedicated customer service, though there might be a learning curve due to manual configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is often seen as cost-efficient, offering a strong long-term ROI with automated vulnerability resolution, albeit with a one-time setup fee. Rapid7 InsightAppSec requires a higher initial investment because of its extensive features. Despite the cost, the potential return on investment can be significant for organizations that need continuous, detailed security analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,027 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Container Security (24th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 8.8%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 5.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	8.8%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec	5.8%
Other	85.4%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Shritam Bhowmick

Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett

Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options

There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly and it's a very user-friendly product."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

More Invicti pros

"The reporting functionality is excellent."

"We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent."

"It is a very robust solution."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is a good product for dynamic application security testing, providing neat reports that include validation actions and helping to generate web application firewall rules for web applications."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the graphical interface."

"The templates feature is very easy; you just choose the kind of attack you want on your web application, and you run it against that template and receive a report, which is great."

"I would rate the technical support from Rapid7 a ten, indicating high-quality support."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

Cons

"I find that the scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement."

"It is a good tool, as we found out with the Community Edition trial, but the price point is quite expensive for a startup or average-sized company."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

More Invicti cons

"I would like more details of what the product can do."

"In the future, if they can have integration with a lot of ticketing systems then it would be amazing."

"The reporting feature of Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement as it currently provides basic reports."

"They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity."

"Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version."

"We'd like to see integrations with WAF solutions."

"The performance can be improved."

"The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The price should be 20% lower"

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Customers sometimes experience issues with performance. One thing that I recall is that most customers often want to have reporting as per their customized dashboard. This needs to be improved beca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

I usually recommend this solution for financial institutions. Banks and financial institutions need this solution mostly because they have to follow stringent compliance advisory requirements, so t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

I have not heard any complaints. I do not have any recommendations because customers were initially worried about the number of scans they used to perform, and now it has been enhanced or it will s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 11% of the time

AppCheck vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 9% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

April 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

April 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

InsightAppSec

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

February 2026

Free Report: Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.