Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Invicti is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Invicti holds a 7.8% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,424 Views
753 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 20 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

1,827 Views
639 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Invicti

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Invicti and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are both competitive application security solutions focusing on identifying and remediating vulnerabilities. Rapid7 InsightAppSec may have an edge due to its advanced integration capabilities and analytics, appealing to organizations that prioritize these features.

Features: Invicti combines deep scanning capabilities with automation, helping to streamline vulnerability management. It excels in accuracy, automation, and provides proof-based scanning to reduce false positives. Rapid7 InsightAppSec integrates seamlessly with various DevOps tools and is noted for providing detailed security insights thanks to its advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could work on simplifying its manual configuration process to enhance user experience. Speed optimization for full scans would be beneficial, as some users experience delays. Better integration with certain tools could also broaden its appeal. Rapid7 InsightAppSec might refine its user interface to enhance usability. Addressing occasional issues with report export functionalities could improve efficiency. Additionally, reducing initial costs would make it more accessible to a broader range of organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightAppSec offers a cloud-based deployment model with excellent customer support, including comprehensive documentation. Users appreciate the streamlined deployment, particularly when needing fast implementation. Invicti provides flexibility with both cloud and on-premises solutions, supported by dedicated customer service, though there might be a learning curve due to manual configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is often seen as cost-efficient, offering a strong long-term ROI with automated vulnerability resolution, albeit with a one-time setup fee. Rapid7 InsightAppSec requires a higher initial investment because of its extensive features. Despite the cost, the potential return on investment can be significant for organizations that need continuous, detailed security analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 882,333 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 7.8%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 6.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Invicti	7.8%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec	6.2%
Other	86.0%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Shritam Bhowmick

Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett

Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options

There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Attacking feature: Actually, attacking is not a solo feature. It contains many attack engines, Hawk, and many properties. But Netsparker's attacking mechanism is very flexible. This increases the vulnerability detection rate. Also, Netsparker made the Hawk for real-time interactive command-line-based exploit testing. It's very valuable for a vulnerability scanner."

"This tool is really fast and the information that they provide on vulnerabilities is pretty good."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

"Invicti has done a commendable job with respect to ROI, and with respect to being a cost-effective solution and one of the market leaders as an effective solution for SAST and DAST, Invicti has performed very well."

"Invicti is a good product, and its API testing is also good."

"Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios."

"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."

More Invicti pros

"When considering DAST, it is not attributed to a singular feature but rather the capabilities of the engine that provides a genuine penetration testing experience and delivers insightful reports."

"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."

"In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to paste the provided CDN into your metadata. Once connected, every piece of information, including vulnerabilities, can be accessed. It also offers demo sessions."

"The templates feature is very easy. You just choose the kind of attack you want on your web application, and you run it against that template and receive a report. It's great."

"Dynamic application security scanning provides predefined templates and supports customization. The ability to scan external and internal applications, including on-premises ones, is precious. Additionally, it is a cloud platform, so we don't need to deploy servers or resources. This makes it time-efficient and cost-effective."

"The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."

"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."

"The reporting functionality is excellent."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

Cons

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

More Invicti cons

"I required a solution to manage on-premises, but I was not as satisfied as expected."

"We get a lot of false positives during the tests."

"There is room for improvement in Rapid7 InsightAppSec by giving clients the ability for extra columns on reports and enabling the extraction of remediation reports into a CSV format. Currently, the PDF format is cumbersome to go through when dealing with thousands of pages."

"Customers sometimes experience issues with performance."

"The product’s pricing could be flexible."

"There is room for improvement in the response time of customer service and support levels."

"The reporting feature of Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement as it currently provides basic reports."

"When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

Our main use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec is to perform internal assessment of applications and external facing applications. We have a cloud engine plus on-premises engine, and we have been lever...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Rapid7 AppSpider vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 16% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 10% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 8% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

February 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

January 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

InsightAppSec

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

December 2025

Free Report: Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.