Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Invicti is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Invicti holds a 7.8% mindshare in DAST, compared to Rapid7’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.
Invicti
Read 31 Invicti reviews
  • 3,424 Views
  • 753 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Read 20 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews
  • 1,827 Views
  • 639 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Invicti and Rapid7 InsightAppSec are both competitive application security solutions focusing on identifying and remediating vulnerabilities. Rapid7 InsightAppSec may have an edge due to its advanced integration capabilities and analytics, appealing to organizations that prioritize these features.

Features: Invicti combines deep scanning capabilities with automation, helping to streamline vulnerability management. It excels in accuracy, automation, and provides proof-based scanning to reduce false positives. Rapid7 InsightAppSec integrates seamlessly with various DevOps tools and is noted for providing detailed security insights thanks to its advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could work on simplifying its manual configuration process to enhance user experience. Speed optimization for full scans would be beneficial, as some users experience delays. Better integration with certain tools could also broaden its appeal. Rapid7 InsightAppSec might refine its user interface to enhance usability. Addressing occasional issues with report export functionalities could improve efficiency. Additionally, reducing initial costs would make it more accessible to a broader range of organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightAppSec offers a cloud-based deployment model with excellent customer support, including comprehensive documentation. Users appreciate the streamlined deployment, particularly when needing fast implementation. Invicti provides flexibility with both cloud and on-premises solutions, supported by dedicated customer service, though there might be a learning curve due to manual configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is often seen as cost-efficient, offering a strong long-term ROI with automated vulnerability resolution, albeit with a one-time setup fee. Rapid7 InsightAppSec requires a higher initial investment because of its extensive features. Despite the cost, the potential return on investment can be significant for organizations that need continuous, detailed security analysis.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Invicti
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)
Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 7.8%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 6.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Invicti7.8%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec6.2%
Other86.0%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam - PeerSpot reviewer
Valavan Sivgalingam
Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS
Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations
It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.
Read full review
Shritam Bhowmick - PeerSpot reviewer
Shritam Bhowmick
Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett
Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options
There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."
"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."
"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."
"Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios."
"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."
"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."
"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."
"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."
More Invicti pros
"The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."
"The automatic automation of the automated authorization to the SCANNET environment is valuable."
"It's very easy to use and user-friendly. It does the job."
"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."
"The product’s most valuable feature is UI. It is easy to manage and find vulnerabilities in the application."
"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."
"We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent."
"When considering DAST, it is not attributed to a singular feature but rather the capabilities of the engine that provides a genuine penetration testing experience and delivers insightful reports."
More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros
 

Cons

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."
"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."
"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."
"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."
"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"
"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."
"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."
"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."
More Invicti cons
"When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved."
"We get a lot of false positives during the tests."
"I required a solution to manage on-premises, but I was not as satisfied as expected."
"There is room for improvement in the response time of customer service and support levels."
"Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version."
"The product’s pricing could be flexible."
"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface. They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys."
"The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec."
More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
"It is competitive in the security market."
"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
"The price should be 20% lower"
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
More Invicti pricing and cost advice
"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."
"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."
"The price of this product is very cheap."
"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."
"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."
"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Invicti?
At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Invicti?
I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...
See all answers
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to p...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
Our main use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec is to perform internal assessment of applications and external facing applications. We have a cloud engine plus on-premises engine, and we have been lever...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti Logo
Acunetix vs Invicti
Compared 12% of the time
Veracode vs Invicti Logo
Veracode vs Invicti
Compared 7% of the time
SonarQube vs Invicti Logo
SonarQube vs Invicti
Compared 7% of the time
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Logo
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti
Compared 5% of the time
Snyk vs Invicti Logo
Snyk vs Invicti
Compared 4% of the time
More Invicti Competitors
Rapid7 AppSpider vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
Rapid7 AppSpider vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Compared 16% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Compared 10% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Compared 8% of the time
Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Compared 8% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Compared 7% of the time
More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Invicti
February 2026
Invicti reportDownload Invicti product report
Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 InsightAppSec
January 2026
Rapid7 InsightAppSec reportDownload Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report
 

Also Known As

Netsparker
InsightAppSec
 

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

Rapid7
 

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace
Buyer's Guide
Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec
December 2025
Free Report: Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Invicti vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec report.
See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.