Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HCL AppScan vs Invicti comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Invicti's customer service is praised for professionalism and promptness, offering effective support through various communication channels and regional partners.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.9
Invicti needs improved efficiency, better authentication, reporting, more database support, and enhancements in UI, documentation, and security features.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Invicti is highly scalable, excelling in handling multiple installations and extensive scans, despite occasional performance slowdowns with large applications.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Invicti offers flexible pricing, competitive for large enterprises, with subscriptions ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for detailed security insights.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Invicti is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, except for occasional high resource usage and temporary glitches with large applications.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
Invicti offers detailed scanning, customizable checks, and CI/CD integration, emphasizing accuracy and flexibility in web security testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
12th
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (13th)
Invicti
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
14th
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
API Security (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 23.8%, down from 29.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 16.2%, up from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Gladwin Christian - PeerSpot reviewer
A useful tool to scan applications that can be easily installed
Given that we have been using HCL AppScan for many years, I think the setup process is not difficult at all. Sometimes, some issues stop or prevent my company from moving forward with the product's setup phase. We have to call HCL's support team and engage in long discussions to smoothly carry out the setup phase. In general, the product's setup phase is not difficult in our company. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The licenses for the solution are available only on cloud deployments nowadays. The solution is already installed in our environment. Every time a new release or software comes out from HCL, our company does a scan, which takes maybe a day or two.
Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
A safe solution used to detective vulnerabilities for dynamic and complex testing
The Invicti is the scope application tool. The solution is installed on-premise but could be installed as a web version. Starting from the latest version, the web version could be used. They have a web application server. The deployment of the solution involves installing the EXE and configuring your machine.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?
The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?
They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities.
What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?
We use AppScan primarily for security testing and performance monitoring across our systems.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
Netsparker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.