JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs WebLogic Suite comparison

"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The solution is useful for centralizing data."

"The program is scalable."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"WebLogic Suite is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides one place where you can control all of the services."

"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."

"It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."

"The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."

"The support is not good."

"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."

"I rate the scalability of WebLogic Suite an eight out of ten."

"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."

"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."

"Support could be better. The expertise when we have some Oracle WebLogic issues and challenges is not there. The issues are not being addressed in time. This really needs to be improved going forward."

"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"While I am not directly involved with the financial aspects, JBoss is known for its reasonable subscription pricing. Potential users should consider whether the cost aligns with their budget and requirements."

"It is an open-source solution."

"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."

"Scaling is costly."

"Technical support is very costly."

"The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."

"The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."