Oracle WebCenter vs WebLogic Suite comparison

"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."

"Integration within the solution is very good."

"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."

"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."

"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."

"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."

"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"This is a robust solution."

"The product is reliable."

"WebLogic adds a lot of value to business and investments."

"WebLogic Suite is scalable."

"The most valuable feature of WebLogic is it has excellent performance and stability compared to the previous solution we used."

"It integrates various applications easily, provided there is a coder available."

"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."

"Its functions need more stability."

"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."

"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."

"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."

"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."

"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."

"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."

"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."

"The support is not good."

"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."

"I think the support could be much better."

"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."

"There is no need for improvement with WebLogic Suite, although its coherence is a bit more complicated."

"The content search is not easy."

"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."

"There are sometimes issues with clusters."

"The price needs to be lowered."

"WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."

"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."

"Scaling is costly."

"The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."

"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."

"Technical support is very costly."

"The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."