Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

Adobe and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Adobe is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while Oracle is ranked #16. Adobe holds a 3.0% mindshare in ECM, compared to Oracle’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 70% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Adobe Experience Manager

Read 20 Adobe Experience Manager reviews

998 Views
674 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle WebCenter

Read 12 Oracle WebCenter reviews

731 Views
563 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

Oracle WebCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Oracle WebCenter and Adobe Experience Manager are competing in web content management. Adobe Experience Manager has the upper hand due to its advanced feature set, despite Oracle WebCenter's competitive pricing and support advantages.

Features: Oracle WebCenter offers integration capabilities, collaboration tools, and seamless access to other Oracle applications. Adobe Experience Manager provides robust content management, advanced analytics, and digital asset management.

Room for Improvement: Oracle WebCenter needs enhancements in user interface design, better documentation, and broader third-party integrations. Adobe Experience Manager could improve its cost structure, reduce complexity, and enhance customizability for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle WebCenter offers flexible deployment options and effective customer service solutions. Adobe Experience Manager features streamlined cloud-based deployment and integrated support services that enhance overall user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebCenter is more budget-friendly and offers a potential for strong ROI. Adobe Experience Manager justifies its higher cost with expansive capabilities that promise a significant return on investment over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

8th

Ranking in Web Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (6th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (1st)

Oracle WebCenter

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

16th

Ranking in Web Content Management

8th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (33rd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 3.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebCenter is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Thomas Becker

Managing Partner(Austria) at a integrator with 11-50 employees

Impressive integration of customer behavior with an easy setup and okay support

I've worked with all major content management systems. Currently, I work with the leaders such as Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and Acquia Working with big companies, I help them either consider setting up a new content management system or address issues they might have with their existing…

Read full review

Mehdi Hasankhan

Head of Development and Implementation at Arak Petrochemical Company

Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products

WebCenter content access has a lot of options and flexibility. At this time, I only see one problem: in the sub-content and channels surrounding Windows 10. It only functions with Windows 7 and Windows 8. All of the operating systems in my company are up-to-date and we are using Windows 10. For whatever reason, you can't use the Oracle content on these platforms at all. This lapse is very bad for my company because I can't change the version of Word and downgrade. Maybe it is just a technical problem. But it is a lot of my problem with this solution currently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

"I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"Easy to work with the solution."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR."

More Adobe Experience Manager pros

"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."

"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."

"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."

"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."

"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."

"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."

"Integration within the solution is very good."

Cons

"Adobe Experience Manager could improve by allowing the reuse of components like a progress bar across multiple pages to make the development process more efficient."

"A little bit of background knowledge of coding and website structure is required."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"The licenses are very expensive."

More Adobe Experience Manager cons

"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."

"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."

"Its functions need more stability."

"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."

"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."

"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."

"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."

"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"It's really costly."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."

"The price needs to be lowered."

"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

43%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?

It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?

While there are many aspects that could be improved, discussing them would require more time. The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?

I've worked with all major content management systems. Currently, I work with the leaders such as Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and Acquia.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Adobe CQ5 vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText TeamSite vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Drupal vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Adobe Experience Manager Competitors

Oracle Content Management vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 32% of the time

SharePoint vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 17% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 11% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 11% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle WebCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager

April 2025

Download Adobe Experience Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebCenter

April 2025

Download Oracle WebCenter product report

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud

WebCenter, FatWire

Overview

Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.

Adobe

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Metra

Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter

April 2025

Free Report: Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Experience Manager vs. Oracle WebCenter report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.