We haven't done any implementation in the last ten years. That said, we did upgrade it in 2017-16 to the latest version and it was quite okay. It was complex yet not too much. I'd rate it three and a half out of five in terms of ease of setup.
Microsoft Dynamics SL and JD Edwards World are competing in the enterprise resource planning space. Microsoft Dynamics SL seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while JD Edwards World is favored for its extensive features.
Features: Microsoft Dynamics SL provides strengths in project accounting, detailed financial tracking, and accessibility for professional services. JD Edwards World offers extensive supply chain management, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and feature-rich environments that are favored in industry-specific scenarios.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics SL allows a simpler deployment process suitable for small to medium enterprises with accessible customer service. JD Edwards World, although complex in deployment due to features, supports large enterprises with a comprehensive service model that extends post-deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics SL features a more accessible pricing structure appealing to mid-market companies, with a reasonable initial setup and steady ROI. JD Edwards World has a higher initial cost but provides a strong ROI over time for enterprises utilizing its features in manufacturing and supply chains.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
