JD Edwards World vs SAP ERP comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Oracle is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.7, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.5. Oracle holds a 1.2% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 11.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

JD Edwards World

Read 17 JD Edwards World reviews

872 Views
846 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 108 SAP ERP reviews

10,532 Views
9,058 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

JD Edwards World

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and JD Edwards World compete in the ERP software category. SAP ERP appears to have the upper hand in business integrations and comprehensive functionality, while JD Edwards World excels in ease of use and specific module support.

Features: SAP ERP provides extensive business efficiency with modules supporting finance, supply chain management, and human capital management. Its customizable features and seamless integration capabilities make it suitable for large enterprises. JD Edwards World is known for its user-friendliness, offering unique functionalities and solid support in modules such as MRP and traceability.

Room for Improvement: SAP ERP is often criticized for its high costs, a complex user interface, and integration challenges with external systems. Users seek a better user experience and more straightforward integration options. JD Edwards World is perceived as outdated, lacking modern support and significant updates, with much of its functionality considered legacy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ERP offers both on-premises and cloud configurations, catering to various business scales. Its customer service is generally satisfactory but noted for slow and costly technical support. JD Edwards World primarily provides on-premises deployment, with its support often criticized for being outsourced and insufficiently robust.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP comes with high licensing fees and maintenance costs, making it less accessible for small to medium enterprises, though its ROI is achieved over several years through efficiency gains. JD Edwards World is more financially accessible, benefiting from legacy product pricing, but its ROI potential is limited by its narrower feature set compared to SAP ERP.

To learn more, read our detailed JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards World

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of JD Edwards World is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 11.6%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP ERP	11.6%
JD Edwards World	1.2%
Other	87.2%

ERP

Featured Reviews

RohitTrivedi

Senior Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integration and customization streamline complex processes for improved efficiency

The user interface in JD Edwards World is very crude; I press a button to get to the application, unlike EnterpriseOne, which offers a more finished experience with dashboards. Other software like Salesforce or Cognos offers a good user interface where users find it intuitive to navigate. It should be more accessible, even for those who have never interacted with JD Edwards World before.

Read full review

Achmad Dimyati

IT Service Management Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-term adaptation and evolution meets changing technology trends

SAP ERP is not really real-time. We use the HANA database which is supposed to be memory data in memory, but we are still not very happy. It is supposed to be real-time and come very quickly, but in reality, it still takes time to run. That is why we use BW of SAP, Business Objects, and now we have moved to the Analytic Cloud where we start using predictive AI. SAP recently implemented Databricks, and they started investing significantly in the analytic environment. SAP ERP has been left behind as they moved to S/4HANA with the HANA database. They restructured the whole table structure of SAP ERP, introduced simple finance, simple logistics, and moved HR to SuccessFactors. They have the BTP layer where they manage everything from integration to master data management. The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology. The fundamental has changed differently. It is not monolithic anymore but different products under one name, SAP. You have to buy it model by model for additional models. Products such as SuccessFactors, Ariba for procure to pay, Concur for travel, and Facility Management use totally different technology. They try to integrate with each other, but it remains a challenge for SAP to make them have the same management, technology, and operational approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is consistently there."

"The most valuable feature in JD Edwards World is World Writer, the reporting functionality; inventory management in JD Edwards World is useful and it helps with supply chain as long as the setup is done correctly."

"JD Edwards World supports operations in manufacturing and distribution, which are crucial for our organization."

"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."

"I think JDE ERP is very flexible and very convenient for the users. I think EnterpriseOne is more convenient for users to do the inquiry and do the data entry. The UI is better than JDE World. For JDE products, including the World version, is very flexible. It's a good product for clients."

"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions."

"The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem."

"Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse."

More JD Edwards World pros

"Good customization features."

"They provide a full service."

"The stability and performance are good."

"It is an integrated application, and it has been working really well. Earlier, there were different companies for different applications for manufacturing, finance controlling, logistics, and quality. It probably was the first fully integrated application. Whenever somebody is entering any data, for example, invoice data or ordering data, everyone with a right to see this data can see it in the system."

"MDG provides a central location for governance of the creation/updating processes of master data. It allows you to change several fields in the same object. For example, we can change a field on the purchasing view and change another field on an accounting view to the same material at the same time."

"The most valuable features are the ease of installation and the MM functionality."

"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."

"The implementation is very straightforward."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"The flexibility and ability to integrate external applications are increasingly vital."

"JD Edwards World is very outdated and not really supported anymore."

"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."

"There are a lot of new technologies coming out and JD Edwards World could improve by having better integration with other databases. The integration with the databases and applications should be in real-time, such as with Oracle."

"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable so that it could be available to a broader audience. My clients want more analytics or data analysis features from JD Edwards World."

"The interfaces need to be more user-friendly. For example, our purchaser had difficulties updating prices as it required updating line by line."

"The technical support from Oracle needs a lot of improvement. Both the response time and quality of support require enhancement."

"Improvements are needed in transitioning JD Edwards World to a more stable and reliable cloud product, particularly in terms of GDPR and data privacy compliance."

More JD Edwards World cons

"Improvements to the UI. The UI is pretty old, but this will change with the upcoming release of S.4."

"The solution's UI could be better."

"The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology."

"The initial setup of SAP ERP is complex and it took a lot of time."

"Though SAP ERP's FICO module is a strong part of the product, its integration capabilities can be made stronger."

"Technical support could be better."

"The speed to build and the speed to deliver could be better."

"It should be less complex. It should also have better integration capability. I am using the ACC version, and in this version, the integration and the communication are very difficult and complicated."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced."

"You have to pay for a license, and the license cost is calculated based on the number of users you have."

"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable."

"There is a license needed to use this solution."

"When we talk about pricing it is expensive. On a scale of one to ten, it would rank a two. There are no additional fees but the user licenses are high."

"We pay annually for the use of this solution."

"SAP is quite expensive."

"There is an annual subscription for the use of SAP ERP."

"Licensing can vary, but for educational institutions, there are often favorable conditions."

"The on-premises licensing model comes with annual maintenance whereas the cloud-based licensing model is a yearly subscription. The tool’s pricing is normal and not expensive."

"My company makes early payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product. There are no additional costs apart from the charges paid toward the subscription-based license offered by SAP."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Wholesaler/Distributor

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

University

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	77

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards World?

The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards World?

JD Edwards World's key point for improvement is to be more digitally enabled. It also needs to assist all the different industries more than it currently does. The lack of functionality in JD Edwar...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JD Edwards World?

JD Edwards World is used for almost everything, with multi-skilling across all the modules.

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP ERP?

The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

I do not know how to give feedback regarding SAP ERP's analytics tools. The usage of analytics tools is not very popular among our customers, as some functions are not very modern. Customer study t...

See all answers

Comparisons

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs JD Edwards World

Compared 22% of the time

Pronto Xi vs JD Edwards World

Compared 15% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs JD Edwards World

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Business One vs JD Edwards World

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics SL vs JD Edwards World

Compared 8% of the time

More JD Edwards World Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 11% of the time

Infor LN vs SAP ERP

Compared 8% of the time

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 8% of the time

Anaplan vs SAP ERP

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World

January 2026

Download JD Edwards World product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

January 2026

Download SAP ERP product report

Overview

Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.

Oracle

SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.

SAP

Sample Customers

SICIM S.p.A., Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A, Atrium European Real Estate, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Calumet Specialty Partners, LP Products, Grupo Arcor, Original BUFF S.A., Shelf Drilling Ltd., African + Eastern, Westfield Group LLC, Sportmaster Ltd., Beijing Xinladao Restaurant Group

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

December 2025

Free Report: JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JD Edwards World vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.