We haven't done any implementation in the last ten years. That said, we did upgrade it in 2017-16 to the latest version and it was quite okay. It was complex yet not too much. I'd rate it three and a half out of five in terms of ease of setup.
JD Edwards World and Sage MAS are competing enterprise resource planning solutions. JD Edwards World holds an edge due to its robust functionality in finance and manufacturing sectors.
Features: JD Edwards World provides comprehensive integrated modules for finance, distribution, and manufacturing operations, ensuring seamless data management across departments. It stands out with its robust functionality especially in these sectors. Sage MAS offers advanced customization capabilities, which make it ideal for businesses seeking tailored solutions. Its customization versatility makes it appealing in niche markets.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards World is typically deployed on IBM systems, which might affect initial setup speed and flexibility. It benefits from strong customer support for smooth implementation and maintenance. Sage MAS offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise and cloud, enabling faster setup and access to a wider range of support channels. The difference lies in JD Edwards's strong service support compared to Sage MAS's flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards World involves a higher initial cost, which is justified by its comprehensive features and long-term operational benefits, promising a higher long-term ROI. Sage MAS tends to have a lower entry price, making it accessible for small to medium-sized enterprises looking for quick returns with affordable tailored features. The key difference is JD Edwards's high up-front cost and comprehensive functionality versus Sage MAS's affordability and quicker ROI.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
