Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jitterbit Harmony vs Talend Open Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Customers commend Jitterbit Harmony support for its responsive, efficient service, detailed guidance, knowledgeable staff, and extensive resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Users find Jitterbit Harmony needing faster processing, improved support, better integration, stability, clearer documentation, competitive pricing, simpler setup, and regular updates.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Users find Jitterbit Harmony reliable and efficient, with smooth implementation and consistent performance for expanding data integration needs.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Jitterbit Harmony provides flexible and cost-effective pricing for different integration needs, requiring direct consultation for customized quotes.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Users praise Jitterbit Harmony for its stability, reliability, ability to handle large data, and strong support, boosting user confidence.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Users praise Jitterbit Harmony's intuitive interface, powerful integration, seamless connectivity, drag-and-drop function, real-time sync, and pre-built connectors.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Harmony
Ranking in Data Integration
35th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (21st), Cloud Data Integration (21st), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (13th)
Talend Open Studio
Ranking in Data Integration
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Harmony is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Talend Open Studio is 5.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Abd Kader - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-setup solution with good stability
We use Jitterbit to connect cloud solutions with our on-premises ERP system We connect cloud solutions to our on-premise ERP system easily using Jitterbit. It is its most valuable feature.  The solution's API management capabilities need improvement. We have been using the solution for almost…
Jason Hale - PeerSpot reviewer
Intuitive interface and documentation make it simple to build jobs and APIs and logging helps pinpoint and resolve issues quickly
Talend is doing a lot of work at the moment, and it's not there yet, but the whole platform could be managed in a SaaS-type environment. You still need to have the Studio running on a virtual desktop or a PC. They will get to be able to do the whole thing inside your browser, so you don't need to install anything locally. It's down the track, and it's the nirvana that we were looking for in Boomi. But the biggest challenge they have is that the platform is so focused on the Studio for all of its development. They'll probably get there, but they have such a mature Studio client that it's a huge amount of work to get all of that functionality into a browser or SaaS platform. That's pretty much the biggest flaw with the Talend environment—being reliant on the Studio, which needed to be on a local machine. The only other thing is that you have to integrate into an API gateway. We're in Azure, so we use Microsoft Azure Gateway. It doesn't come with its own gateway, which is another sort of big plus side that we saw in Boomi. Talend isn't quite there yet with the API gateway. Other than that, it's bloody hard to find something because it just seems to be all good.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jitterbit Harmony Platform?
The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with Jitterbit Harmony Platform?
The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What do you like most about Talend Open Studio?
It is easy to use and covers most of the functions needed. We can use the code without any extra effort. The open source is very good. They have the same commercials with additional connectors. The...
 

Also Known As

Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
Open Studio
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
Almerys, BF&M, Findus
Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Harmony vs. Talend Open Studio and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.