OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs k6 Open Source comparison

k6 and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. k6 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. k6 holds a 3.7% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of k6 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

524 Views
383 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 42 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,992 Views
1,747 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

k6 Open Source and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud compete in the performance testing tools category. k6 Open Source is preferred by users for its transparent pricing model and ease of use, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is chosen for its comprehensive features and scalability, despite a higher price.

Features: k6 Open Source is known for its simplicity and efficiency in running load tests. It integrates with JavaScript, a feature favored by small and medium-sized businesses. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a robust feature set, including extensive protocol support and advanced analytics capabilities, serving enterprises with complex testing needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: k6 Open Source supports quick and easy deployment with minimal configuration, aided by a supportive community and substantial documentation. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a cloud-based deployment model suited for larger teams, with dedicated customer service providing support throughout setup and execution phases.

Pricing and ROI: k6 Open Source is free, reducing initial setup costs and enhancing ROI for budget-conscious organizations. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires a higher investment, justified by its scalability and advanced features, appealing to businesses needing robust performance testing solutions who can invest more for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (10th)

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 3.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 8.6%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

AlexLogan

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Has realistic scenario composition for performance tests and is highly scalable, but the user interface needs improvement

The solution generates traffic on the infrastructure, which resembles end users. Depending on the performance of the underlying infrastructure and nodes of the architecture, our company team can report on the scalability of applications. The solution performs two types of tests: user interface testing, which is implemented primarily in our organization for online banking, and the other one is API level testing for mobile banking. In terms of the feature set, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is a market-leading application that has been around for 20 years. I have been working with the solution throughout the acquisition stages; the product used to be much better when it was primarily managed by Mercury. There are limited AI capabilities in the solution; when I was personally operating some smart scenarios using the feature of auto-scaling, I found it unsatisfying. I would recommend the product to others based on its feature set and the level of support. I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as seven out of ten. There are no glaring weaknesses in the product, and it's good enough for its core purpose.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"It's fast, easy to use, has a user-friendly UI, and you can split users."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

"A vital feature of the solution is its ability to compose realistic scenarios for performance testing"

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."

"This solution is SaaS based so we can utilize cloud technology, which is less time consuming and saves a lot of of money."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"CI/CD integration could be a little bit better. When there's a test and if you see that there are high response times in the test itself, it would be great to be able to send an alert. It would give a heads-up to the architect community or ops community."

"In terms of new features, they can natively integrate with Chaos engineering tools such as Chaos Monkey and AWS FIS. With LoadRunner, we can generate load, and if Chaos tools are also supported natively, it will help to get everything together."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"The product must provide agents to monitor servers."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"We encounter hurdles while running the professional version for on-premise setup."

"I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"The solution is expensive."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.

See all answers

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I would prefer it to be cheaper. On a scale of one to ten, the price is a five. It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter ( /products/apache-jmeter-reviews ), which is free.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 53% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 17% of the time

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs k6 Open Source

Compared 8% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

April 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Also Known As

Load Impact

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.