OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise vs k6 Open Source comparison

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."

"It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it."

"LoadRunner's UI is project-convenient, allowing easier simulation of real-time scenarios and producing comprehensive reports that are effortless to read."

"We can measure metrics like hits per second and detect deviations or issues through graphs. We can filter out response times based on timings and identify spikes in the database or AWS reports."

"The fact that you can have tens of thousands of virtual users and just expand an army of load generators to hammer on whatever application you're testing."

"It offers easy integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace, Splunk, etc."

"We implemented through the vendor, who used highly-skilled professionals."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."

"Canned reports are always a challenge and a question with customers because customers want to see sexy reports."

"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and by including autocorrelation capability."

"The product's scalability must be improved."

"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."

"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."

"A room for improvement in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is that it should take multiple exhibitions for a particular scenario and have automatic trending for that. This will be a very useful feature that lets users look into how many exhibitions happened for the scenario and their performance, and you should be able to see the data within the Performance Center dashboard. For example, there's one scenario I'm focusing on multiple times in a month, and if I check five times, there's no way for me to see the trend and find out how it went with those five exhibitions. It would be great if the Performance Center has a view of all five exhibitions, particularly transaction by transaction, and how they happened. If Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise shows you the time trends, information about one exhibition to another, and how each performed, it'll be an immense feature, and that should be visible to every user. Reporting should be simpler in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. If I did a scenario with one exhibition now, and I did that scenario again, then I should be able to schedule that scenario for the exhibition, and if that scenario is executed multiple times, there should be the option to turn it into a single view that shows you all the transactions, how the performance was, what the trend graph is for a particular time, etc."

"It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"ROI is 200%."

"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."

"The solution should decrease its price."

"There is an ROI. What LoadRunner does, is it prevents failures when there are many, many concurrent users in the systems of a company."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's price is high."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."