Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Katalon Studio
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)
UiPath Test Suite
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Katalon Studio is 11.2%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow
I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications. The speed is very slow. It takes time. Katalon Studio also takes my laptop memory, and execution becomes slow for the script. There are parallel execution options. I'm sure their online cloud version must be very fast, but as a service-based company, we are under NDA with our clients and can't run their code on our servers. I would like to see iOS improve and see a more capable recording feature. Katalon Studio has released an AI version, and I have a demo scheduled to see the new features.
Deepak Digar. - PeerSpot reviewer
Increases productivity compared to other tools
The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"The product provides ease of automation for the cloud."
"Overall, I recommend it highly and find it easy to use with many integrations."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"The automation is very fast and you don't need to be overly proficient in coding."
"The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
 

Cons

"Its stability needs improvement."
"There could potentially be more reporting within the solution. We need more issue reports, for example."
"The Object Spy is rather frustrating to work with, so I tend not to use it."
"I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications."
"The solution can be further improved with better loading time."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
"There is not much support offered for the free version, which is something that could be improved."
"It should start working on Silverlight automation."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
"The pricing isn't as low as other options."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Katalon Studio is expensive but it is less than some of the other solutions, such as Micro Focus UFT or SmartBear TestComplete. The cost is the main reason we are using Katalon Studio."
"The price is not high it's good."
"The tool is free to use."
"The product’s pricing is very, very low."
"The solution is more affordable than other vendors."
"Its pricing is quite reasonable. If you require their help in getting started, then there is a professional services fee on top of the product license cost."
"We are using the free version. We plan on getting a paid version because there is a limitation in terms of the number of users. We want to maximize it."
"The product is expensive."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."
"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."
"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."
"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."
"It represents good value for the investment."
"Its price is a bit high."
"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Katalon Studio?
The pricing of Katalon Studio is affordable, making it a sensible option for those looking for an affordable range.
What needs improvement with Katalon Studio?
I would like Katalon Studio to develop manual test case generation using AI capabilities, as other tools like those using OpenAI are already doing this. Also, enhancing its test management aspects ...
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola Tesla Black Board TaTa Consultancy Services Sony
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.