Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery vs kCura Relativity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

kCura Relativity
Ranking in eDiscovery
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Recommind Axcelerate eDisco...
Ranking in eDiscovery
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of kCura Relativity is 5.3%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery is 2.5%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

Maria Greene - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2022
A reliable solution with great searching capabilities and good tech support.
It depends on what you need. If you're a law firm and you have a lot of cases, then RelativityOne might be something to look into. If you're a small business and you're really focusing on small-level reviews, then there might be cheaper options for you. I think RelativityOne, because it is so powerful, can be very difficult to use and there's a lot that can go wrong if you don't know how to use it. In order to get the most out of your subscription, I would definitely recommend having someone who has had experience with it and knows how to work the program if you decide to make the investment. Alternatively, budget for some of the Relativity training classes. I would rate this solution as a ten out of ten.
LS
Feb 17, 2023
A good document discovery tool, with a variety of helpful functionality but at a very high price point
We mainly use this solution in litigation to gather, download and host case documents from our client's systems. We are then able to use the search tools to extract the information we need from the database We have found the automatic translation feature of this product to be a game changer…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup was relatively straightforward."
"I like Relativity's blackout feature, as well as the Case Dynamics function."
"There are a lot of ways to QC your work and save your searches, and we had really good case support from the Relativity team."
"The ease of navigation from dock to dock, and that kind of usability, is quite helpful."
"Caplets are a very good technical feature."
"kCura Relativity is easy to use, and it is reliable."
"It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Relativity."
"We have found the automatic translation feature of this product to be a game changer because we work with a lot of clients from China."
 

Cons

"What I dislike about Relativity is that we have to go through the host in order to do productions and loads. It is not a do-it-yourself tool."
"They require more built-in support for some third-party applications."
"I would definitely not recommended it unless you have someone who has had experience with it and knows how to work the program."
"The price per user could be improved. We'd like for it to be more affordable."
"I haven't seen anything on AI merging with Relativity."
"The platform's integration of advanced AI features could further enhance its capabilities."
"There are a lot of bugs on the development side."
"We would like to see some improvement in the price for documents to be hosted via this solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is extremely complicated."
"It's worth the money."
"Users are typically charged a fee per user account and a separate fee based on the amount of data processed and hosted."
"They are maintaining the per gigabyte pricing, and it's based on tiers of how much data you host with them."
"This solution has a fairly high price-point, which may not make it suitable for all organizations. Using this product incurs both high fixed costs, and marginal costs for each additional case being added."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Legal Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Legal Firm
22%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about kCura Relativity?
There are a lot of ways to QC your work and save your searches, and we had really good case support from the Relativity team.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for kCura Relativity?
It's expensive for an individual, but for a company, it's not expensive. And for an individual, I believe it's of no use.
What needs improvement with kCura Relativity?
I haven't seen anything on AI merging with Relativity.
What do you like most about Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery?
We have found the automatic translation feature of this product to be a game changer because we work with a lot of clients from China.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery?
This solution has a fairly high price-point, which may not make it suitable for all organizations. Using this product incurs both high fixed costs, and marginal costs for each additional case being...
What needs improvement with Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery?
We would like to see some improvement in the price for documents to be hosted via this solution.
 

Also Known As

Relativity
Axcelerate eDiscovery
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Webb & Tyler
Gray Plant Mooty, DLA Piper Germany, Stinson Leonard Street LLP
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.