KnowBe4 vs ThreatCop comparison

KnowBe4 and Kratikal Tech are both solutions in the Security Awareness Training category. KnowBe4 is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.5, while Kratikal Tech is ranked #20. KnowBe4 holds a 31.9% mindshare in SAT, compared to Kratikal Tech’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of KnowBe4 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kratikal Tech users who would recommend it.

KnowBe4

Read 4 KnowBe4 reviews

1,848 Views
1,386 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ThreatCop

Read 1 ThreatCop review

71 Views
38 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

KnowBe4

ThreatCop

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KnowBe4 and ThreatCop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about KnowBe4, Proofpoint, Sophos and others in Security Awareness Training.

To learn more, read our detailed Security Awareness Training Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

KnowBe4

Ranking in Security Awareness Training

1st

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatCop

Ranking in Security Awareness Training

20th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Security Awareness Training category, the mindshare of KnowBe4 is 31.9%, down from 36.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatCop is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Awareness Training

Featured Reviews

Brad Mathis

Employee-Owner, Senior Consultant, Information Security at Keller Schroeder

Lowers human element risks and has innovative training

Some more AI-driven automation for creating training and phishing testing campaigns, as well as automated reporting would help. The Phish Alert button could be improved, although it is understood this is due to Microsoft's constant changes. Any improvements in wizards and documentation are always a good thing!. Additonal areas for improvement could be around the technical training and best practice training areas such as NIST CSF, CISv8, Cyberinsurance, and more. Clearer whitelisting requirements are always appreciated. However, the current levels are significant and appreciated.

Read full review

reviewer1378083

Chief Technology Officer at Cyient

Has great value for money with excellent features like unlimited cyber-attack simulation cycles, periodic assessment, and employee hack records

We have been using this tool for a while and have not faced any challenge as such. Talking about the technology, the tool is up to date. The only thing that I found lacking in the product was SIEM integration. Other than that, the tool is a complete package. The training that the tool provides is well structured and user friendly. Also, it has a highly interactive awareness content library based on the current cyber threat landscape. The tool is a versatile attack simulator with enticing template options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their customizable nature allows us to create scenarios that closely resemble real-world phishing attempts, making them highly relatable to our end users."

"There are many valuable features. It's already deployed in the cloud, and you don't have to install anything. You just upload your users to the cloud and tweak something if needed. You can whitelist some servers to work with this properly. When everything is ready, you can start using the platform and its many automated features."

"The main thing is the overall report card. We get to tell the percentages of users who click on links and who don't click on links. We also get an overall score or risk score from them, which also helps us."

"KnowBe4's formulas for risk reduction simply work. Being a technical company, our initial phish-prone percentage wasn't super high, but it was still around 18%. Since we have been requiring ongoing training and simulated phish testing, our average phish-prone percentage hovers in the 0 to 3% range now."

"This tool has great value for money with excellent features like unlimited cyber-attack simulation cycles, periodic assessment, employee hack records as well as gamified assessment."

Cons

"Enhancing the product's emotional intelligence, particularly by providing training content tailored to specific audiences, is an area for improvement."

"It could be more localized for Ukrainian users. This platform is international, and it has a lot of material in different languages, but not in Ukrainian and Russian languages. There's plenty of different content updated regularly for English, French, and German users. They have a lot more information, and Ukrainian users also want more."

"It can be more interactive with users. We want to put the users in different scenarios and let them make decisions. For example, instead of making users go through a video and then asking questions, it can have a video where they click on the scenarios and have to make decisions. It can maybe have something like a live simulation. It would be nice for users."

"The only thing that I found lacking in the product was SIEM integration. Other than that, the tool is a complete package. The training that the tool provides is well structured and user friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is paid on a yearly basis. You can go to the official site to check their approximate pricing. It's based on the number of users or staff. It can vary from country to country, but for Ukraine, it works as it's stated on the site."

"I don't know the cost, but I believe we are paying yearly. We did like a three-year or five-year contract. I am not aware of any extra costs in addition to a standard licensing fee."

"I rate the product pricing as four out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Awareness Training solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KnowBe4?

Their customizable nature allows us to create scenarios that closely resemble real-world phishing attempts, making them highly relatable to our end users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KnowBe4?

My advice would be to find a trusted partner and work with them. The pricing model is simple. If you have the technical staff and bandwidth, you may implement it yourself. However, if you want to g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with KnowBe4?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Terranova Security vs KnowBe4

Compared 20% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness vs KnowBe4

Compared 14% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs KnowBe4

Compared 12% of the time

Kaspersky Security Awareness vs KnowBe4

Compared 9% of the time

SANS Security Awareness vs KnowBe4

Compared 4% of the time

More KnowBe4 Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KnowBe4

December 2024

Download KnowBe4 product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

November 2024

Download ThreatCop product report

Learn More

KnowBe4

Kratikal Tech

Overview

Old school Security Awareness Training is static. It’s a one-time event without follow-up. KnowBe4's Kevin Mitnick Security Awareness Training starts with a baseline test to show the actual Phish-prone percentage of your users. Then it steps users through effective, interactive, on-demand browser-based training. As step three, you send frequent simulated phishing attacks to your employees to reinforce the training. This last feature, frequent simulated phishing attacks (we recommend at the very least once a month) really creates a change in behavior.

ThreatCop is an AI/ML-based security attack simulator and awareness tool that assesses the real-time threat posture of an organization from the people’s point of view and imparts awareness.

Sample Customers

West Aurora Public School District 129

Kotak Mahindra Bank, RBL Bank

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about KnowBe4, Proofpoint, Sophos and others in Security Awareness Training. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Security Awareness Training vendors.

We monitor all Security Awareness Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.