Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Users manage issues internally with community resources; major firms provide strong support, while open-source relies on internal teams.
Sentiment score
7.1
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, expertise, and reliable, skilled technical support.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.0
Users want a simpler Kubernetes UI, better security, integration, monitoring, deployment, dashboards, non-Linux support, and learning resources.
Sentiment score
5.4
Red Hat OpenShift needs improvements in networking, pricing, user interfaces, and support to address deployment, integration, and functionality challenges.
Although we face issues when migrating to new versions of Kubernetes, such as misunderstandings on using new features or integration with proxy services, these issues can be addressed with proper preparation.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Kubernetes offers efficient scalability, supporting businesses of all sizes with seamless cloud scaling and effortless workload management.
Sentiment score
8.0
Red Hat OpenShift excels in scalability with efficient auto-scaling and flexible deployment, integrating seamlessly with cloud services.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.9
Kubernetes, while scalable and affordable for enterprises, can be costly for smaller organizations due to infrastructure and operational overhead.
No sentiment score available
Red Hat OpenShift pricing is high, reflecting enterprise-level features, with flexible licensing and discounts for long-term commitments.
Since we use Kubernetes on-premises, the costs are related to our expertise and the personnel we hire.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Kubernetes is stable and mature, with strong community support and reliable performance, despite occasional issues with updates or configurations.
Sentiment score
6.6
Red Hat OpenShift has improved stability, though initial challenges and minor bugs exist; managed services boost reliability.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Kubernetes provides scalable, automated container orchestration, offering ease of use, cloud integration, and robust resource management for enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.3
Red Hat OpenShift excels in auto-scaling, security, user-friendly deployment, and integration with Kubernetes for enhanced productivity and flexibility.
For us, having fast storage classes is very important.
 

Categories and Ranking

Kubernetes
Ranking in Container Management
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Ranking in Container Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Kubernetes is 5.1%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 30.7%, up from 26.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

Swayan Jeet Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions
Some of their services could be improved. Kubernetes deploys containers as ports, and there are some services required to communicate between the ports because communication isn't built into the ports by default. I would also like to have Spark as another distributor service on Kubernetes. Security could be improved. It would be helpful if there were other security modules built into Kubernetes. Security has to be implemented properly.
Vlado Velkovski - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime
OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account. There are a few versions of OpenShift. There is the normal OpenShift and an OpenShift Plus license. Red Hat could think of how to connect those two subscriptions because, with Red Hat Plus, you have one tool called ACM (Advanced Cluster Management), where you can manage multiple clusters from one place. We deployed this functionality by ourselves, but if you don't pay the license for Red Hat OpenShift Plus, you'll lack this functionality. If you have a multi-cloud environment and you have a lot of work to do, it would be a plus if the Red Had OpenShift Plus license came in a bundle with the regular solutions. This ACM tool should be available in the normal subscription, not just the Plus version. There are new versions on an almost weekly basis. I found myself that the upgrading of OpenShift clusters is not a task that will successfully finish every time. It's a simple and quick, but not reliable process. That's why we use multiple clusters. We use v4.10.3, but we want to move to v4.12.X. The upgrade process itself can fail, and we don't have backups of our OpenShift cluster because we have backups of all the Kubernetes manifests on GitHub. We destroy the cluster, bring up a new one quickly, and apply those scripts. The upgrade itself could be more resilient for us as administrators of OpenShift to be sure that it'll succeed and not occasionally fail. They can improve the reliability of their upgrade process. They also have implementations of some Red Hat-verified operators for a lot of products like Elasticsearch. They're good enough for development purposes, but some of the OpenShift operators still lack resilient production-grade configurations. Red Hat says that we have a few hundred operators, but I believe that only half of them are production-grade ready at this moment. They need to work much more on those operators to become more flexible because you can deploy all of them in development mode, but when we go to production grade and want to make specific changes to the operator and configuration, we lack those possibilities.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kubernetes?
There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes?
The pricing depends on the project. Ultimately, it's a business decision, and they need to assess the risks and potential consequences. If the benefits outweigh the costs, then it's a worthwhile in...
What needs improvement with Kubernetes?
Perhaps there are some aspects related to its operation that could be improved. One thing I noticed is when you have multiple deployments and your node count increases beyond eight or nine, the con...
Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?
Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...
What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?
The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?
OpenShift pricing varies by region. For example, a simple cluster with three nodes in DAL-10 might cost around $560 to $580 per month, subject to specific configurations like memory and CPU cores.
 

Also Known As

K8
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Kubernetes vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.