LaunchDarkly vs TeamCity comparison

LaunchDarkly and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. LaunchDarkly is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while JetBrains is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.8. LaunchDarkly holds a 0.3% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LaunchDarkly users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

LaunchDarkly

Read 7 LaunchDarkly reviews

141 Views
37 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,185 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

LaunchDarkly

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

TeamCity and LaunchDarkly are competitors in the software development lifecycle, focusing on different areas. While TeamCity excels in continuous integration, LaunchDarkly is superior in feature flag management due to its flexibility and dynamic release capabilities.

Features: TeamCity offers robust continuous integration capabilities, comprehensive build system integration, and insightful build history analysis. LaunchDarkly provides advanced feature flagging, dynamic configuration management, and real-time updates, offering superior control over feature management and deployment strategies.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could enhance its cloud-native capabilities, expand support for more integrations, and improve real-time monitoring features. LaunchDarkly may benefit from refining its pricing model, enhancing analytics for feature flag usage, and expanding documentation resources to support more complex use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers a straightforward setup with extensive documentation and responsive customer service. LaunchDarkly, being cloud-based, enables quick deployments with minimal infrastructure requirements and proactive customer service. TeamCity's documentation is praised, while LaunchDarkly's cloud-native approach facilitates faster deployment.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity offers flexible pricing models which may include higher initial costs but provide substantial long-term savings for intensive build needs. LaunchDarkly's pricing is seen as high but justified by its feature-rich platform, providing significant ROI through efficient feature management and reduced release risk. LaunchDarkly provides better ROI for dynamic feature management, while TeamCity offers cost advantages in builds and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LaunchDarkly

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of LaunchDarkly is 0.3%. The mindshare of TeamCity is 7.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

James Bayhylle

Principal Technical Program Manager at ChowNow

Provides risk-free releases with control access and A/B testing

It allowed us to deploy faster. Despite having a rigorous code review process that slowed things down, once the code was reviewed, LaunchDarkly enabled safe deployments. If there was ever an issue, we could easily roll back a particular release by simply turning off the feature flag. When configuring and setting this up, begin with feature sets that are relatively small in scope. This helps build the necessary skills to leverage the product effectively while maintaining control over the blast radius, thus reducing risk to your customers and application in case of misconfiguration. As you gain more experience with the solution, it's crucial to have a process to manage feature flag sprawl, as mentioned earlier. Implementing a life cycle management system for your feature flags is essential. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because of its intuitiveness and ease of use.

Read full review

Omakoji Idakwoji

Software Engineer at Home Depot

Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans

I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has really helped during the series of product lines and faster deployment and faster development."

"I appreciate that we can release any feature in production and maintain control over it."

"I like that it offers the ability to control the flags."

"From the development side, it allows us to manage multiple things."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The setup is easy."

"The ability to turn off a flag is crucial when a task is not complete, especially if there is an error in a commit."

"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."

"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."

"The integration is a valuable feature."

"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."

"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns."

"I strongly believe they need to develop a strategy for handling situations where LaunchDarkly goes down."

"The feature where one feature flag is dependent on another could be explored more for our usage."

"Fetching information about multiple flags in a single action would be beneficial."

"Right now, no improvements are needed."

"When the system has an excessive number of feature flags, managing them can become cumbersome."

"I have used LaunchDarkly for around two and a half years and I haven't faced any issues with it."

"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."

"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."

"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."

"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LaunchDarkly?

I consider the pricing to be high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LaunchDarkly?

We need experience to use it, and the initial setup can be difficult. Also, sometimes it has breakdowns. I would rate LaunchDarkly a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LaunchDarkly?

We use LaunchDarkly for managing feature flags. It helps manage the keys to control what users view on our screens.

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs LaunchDarkly

Compared 100% of the time

More LaunchDarkly Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 35% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 18% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 15% of the time

CircleCI vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

March 2025

Download LaunchDarkly product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

March 2025

Download TeamCity product report

Overview

LaunchDarkly is acclaimed for its feature flag management, enabling safer, high-velocity code deployment and precise control over rollouts. Organizations use it to test, deploy, and manage features across user segments, performing canary releases and quick rollbacks without new code deployment. Users praise its robust flag system, real-time updates, detailed targeting, comprehensive analytics, and strong integration capabilities, significantly enhancing development efficiency and productivity.

LaunchDarkly

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity

March 2025

Free Report: LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LaunchDarkly vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.