Layer7 API Management vs webMethods.io comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.6, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Layer7 API Management

Read 111 Layer7 API Management reviews

5,269 Views
3,910 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 91 webMethods.io reviews

3,509 Views
2,420 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and webMethods.io are competitive in the API solutions category. Layer7 appears to have an edge in data security and traffic routing, which are vital for mobile-first strategies, while webMethods.io stands out in integration capabilities, especially with legacy systems.

Features: Layer7 is recognized for its robust API gateway that manages protocol and security token translation. It provides seamless REST-to-SOAP conversions and supports OAuth implementation, essential for securing API calls. Layer7 also offers load-balancing features and integrations with SiteMinder to guard against threats like DDoS. webMethods.io is notable for its comprehensive integration capabilities, efficient data mapping, and lifecycle management which are crucial in complex enterprise environments. It features a flow language that aids in simplifying the debugging and development process.

Room for Improvement: Layer7 users suggest foundational token support should be integrated directly into the base product to avoid additional costs for features like OAuth. Enhancements to the developer portal could elevate user experience. webMethods.io could improve its interface for more intuitive use and expand its middleware integration support, highlighting the need for a streamlined user experience aligned with existing infrastructures. Improving the developer portal is also noted as a potential area for webMethods.io.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Layer7 provides on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options. Feedback on customer service varies, especially post-Broadcom acquisition, with some users noting responsiveness issues. webMethods.io also supports on-premises and hybrid deployments. It is generally praised for good support, though similar to Layer7, users occasionally report delays. Both are recognized for strong technical support, despite some concerns about timeliness.

Pricing and ROI: Layer7 is considered pricey yet competitive, often requiring negotiation to reach a suitable price point. It can offer cost savings compared to competitors depending on the specific feature set utilized. webMethods.io is also seen as expensive but is justified by its vast integration features. Users note the potential for a favorable ROI, thanks to efficient API management, despite higher upfront costs. Both platforms emphasize understanding their value propositions to justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

111

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Featured Reviews

Ronald D'Souza

Presales Consultant for CA Southern Africa at Hyperion Holding Pty Ltd

Has great drag-and-drop features and it requires minimal coding

I have mainly implemented using Layer 7 API Management. Some of the major challenges we were able to meet with a quick release to market methodology. Some of the tasks which we achieved for our customers were: 1. Translation service from SOAP to REST and vice versa. 2. API service to DB (Oracle, MySQL, MSSQL, Snowflake, SAP HANA) -- Created Swagger APIs that were able to perform CRUD operation to the backend API mentioned above and provided routes to query and get data. 3. Integration with Payment gateway service providers to perform (transaction on behalf of the customer with third-party payment gateway service providers white labeled with our APIs ) -- Followed TMF standards for payment gateway integration with the Telcom world. 4. Orchestration of the API. Build multiple microservers and provided orchestration based on route, path, and data in the request and perform actions that would be communicated with multiple APIs and provide a single consolidated response. 5. Provided API-driven security (Oauth 2.0, JWT, SAML, Basic, and a variety of means) to access the API giving the developer the freedom to concentrate only on application/service/microservice and let the gateway handle the threat. 6. Seamless Mutual Authentication allowed good segregation between APIs in the DMZ and internal network.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have more than 50 applications in the backend. We monitor the infrastructure through a database monitoring tool. Our daily tasks involve working on P1 incidents, managing change requests, conducting patching updates, working on P2 tickets, backend server certificate renewals, etc."

"Layer7 API Management's availability on an on-premises deployment model, actually decreases the production time if its users have any issues at the server level."

"Ease of use."

"I work for an information security company. CA API Management is capable of using tokens for authorization to manage access control for the APIs."

"I love the API Gateway, especially the architecture, in terms of the composability of the policies. We approach it from a very software-engineering approach.We build on the policies, like legal blocks, and we deploy them throughout different environments. It's been working out great for us."

"Has great drag-and-drop features and requires minimal coding."

"API Management makes dealing with APIs easier. It'll help you to move ahead on your API application journey. The solution allows developers to create more advanced security policies"

"We are able to go to market very quickly and deploy our functionalities very quickly."

More Layer7 API Management pros

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"I would like to be able to see the publisher role be able to be organized within organizations, so somebody within that role can only manipulate their particular policies."

"Layer7 API Management’s price could be reduced."

"The setup was not as straightforward as it should have been. Support should be improved."

"The Portal lacks maturity. Since the move from Portal 3.x to 4.x, a lot of features were removed. It is slowly coming back. I can see a lot of changes are done in the "background" to decouple components and make it more flexible. Those changes are just not getting to the UI side quick enough."

"I would like for the new release to allow us to speed up code generation. The integration with CICD could also be more seamless."

"Some users say that the API lacks some features and is lagging behind the competition although that has not been my personal experience."

"Layer7 API Management could have a live API creator feature, so my team can easily create APIs. Right now, the product doesn't have that feature."

"We have experienced technical difficulties with the product in the past."

More Layer7 API Management cons

"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

"The product must add more compatible connectors."

"The solution's release management feature could be better."

"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."

"It is difficult to maintain."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Purchase 4.0 now and wait until they flush out the 4.1 problems."

"At the time we bought the product it was a perpetual users license and there has been no need for additional licensing fees."

"The price of Layer7 API Management is reasonable compared to Apigee."

"Pricing for Layer7 API Management is excellent, so it's an eight out of ten. The product is less expensive than other solutions. Layer7 API Management charges you based on the number of transactions, so the enterprise-level pricing my company got was excellent."

"If the CA pricing for API management would be a little lower, they would be able to cover a broader market."

"There are various licensing models for Layer7 API Management. We have to buy additional licenses to get new versions."

"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."

"This solution is a bit more expensive than competitors."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"The product is very expensive."

"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Layer7 API Management?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

The pricing is expensive compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Layer7 API Management could be improved in its logging and alert mechanisms. Furthermore, although cloud deployment has been introduced, I am not familiar with all recent updates. In previous versi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 33% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 11% of the time

3scale API Management vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 2% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Mule ESB vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management

December 2024

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

November 2024

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Learn More

Broadcom

Video not available

IBM

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

Sample Customers

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io

December 2024

Free Report: Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Layer7 API Management vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.