LocalDB vs Oracle Database Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 2.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

LocalDB

Read 6 LocalDB reviews

2,094 Views
1,752 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Read 12 Oracle Database Cloud Service reviews

304 Views
225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LocalDB

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

LocalDB and Oracle Database Cloud Service compete in the database management space, focusing on different operational scales and technological needs. LocalDB stands out for its user-friendly interface and affordability, while Oracle Database Cloud Service excels in scalability and advanced features, appealing to enterprises needing robust solutions.

Features: LocalDB offers simplicity, tight integration with Windows environments, and effective support for lightweight applications. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides powerful analytics, autonomous capabilities, and high scalability for enterprise-level operations.

Room for Improvement: LocalDB could improve by expanding its features beyond basic functionalities, enhancing performance for larger applications, and offering more comprehensive customer support. Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by simplifying its deployment process, offering a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses, and increasing user accessibility to its advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LocalDB offers seamless deployment suited to individual developers or small teams, with a straightforward setup process. Oracle Database Cloud Service demands a more complex deployment fitting for large IT infrastructures, supported by extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: LocalDB is budget-friendly, with minimal initial costs offering a solid ROI for smaller projects. Oracle Database Cloud Service, having a higher setup cost, presents significant ROI through its expansive capabilities and scalable solutions, ideal for organizations investing in long-term database strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LocalDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of LocalDB is 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Cloud Service is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Srini-Dhanaraj

Founder & CEO at imfine.club

The database always has structured data, like rows, columns, and bases

LocalDB is an excellent solution for learners, beginners, and projects of negligible size; it is very good. Any startup can use a local database to start. Once they grow beyond its limits, they can migrate to a MS SQL server that's also available on-premises. I rate it ten out of ten.

Read full review

Ajeet-Sachan

Architect at Sony Pictures Entertainment

Self-maintenance features reduce downtime and improve efficiency but enterprise edition limits can be restrictive

The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved. The model divides their standard edition versus enterprise editions into two categories and limits the standard edition on a particular configuration set. This limitation, such as the thirty-two vCPU limit, should be removed. Another area for improvement is the affordability of the enterprise version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The guidelines are very easy to follow. Maintenance is very easy and requires very little manpower."

"LocalDB is an excellent solution for learners, beginners, and projects of negligible size; it is very good."

"The most valuable feature of LocalDBis the connection between the application and DB."

"The solution is fast."

"The initial setup was simple."

"Oracle DCS's most valuable features are its high availability and scalability."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service is its cloud capabilities."

"Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product."

"I am impressed with the product's partitioning and advanced data card."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its scalability, advanced technology, cost-effectiveness, and the flexibility it provides with licensing."

"The product’s most valuable feature is affordable pricing compared to other providers."

"Data storage is the most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"The self-maintenance features, auto maintenance, cleanup, and backup are the most valuable aspects of Oracle Database Cloud Service."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The ALM features can be improved, but the database by itself is reliable."

"The solution needs to create a management tool. Right now, the solution has tools for creating a local installation, but it's too simplistic. We need something that's a bit more complex so that we can extend the tools with our scripts."

"The initial setup is complex and requires a skilled person."

"It is only for a small amount of data. Local DB is made for the purpose of small-volume optics."

"The internal connection features of LocalDB could improve."

"We encountered connection failures for some of our sites."

"The initial setup is a bit complex for the beginner, so you need a little technical experience to install it."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service has room for improvement in handling large-scale applications."

"Oracle should work on the solution's compatibility issues with the operating system."

"The implementation process could be easier for customers."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by adding some cross-region replication features."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service is a good engine and at the moment, there isn't any new feature I can think of that I'd like added to the service. The only problem I see in Oracle Database Cloud Service is it's more commercial, so it has a relation to how it deals with customers. I don't feel secure in a deal with Oracle because that team changes the conditions each year, and there's no representative from the team that talks to my company about new needs. Oracle needs to improve its relationship with customers and partners in general."

"We're actually going through licensing issues and are looking to perhaps changing to another solution, something that is perhaps open-source."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is too high for LocalDB."

"The fees are fair."

"Price is always higher for all Oracle products."

"Pricing for Oracle Database Cloud Service could be more competitive. Lately, pricing for it has been increasing, so my company may have to review different options to find a solution with competitive pricing. From what I know, there's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees for Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"The tool is not cheap."

"The product has reasonable pricing. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"I think the program is rather expensive, so I would like to see it becoming more affordable."

"Every year we are increasing the price of the solution. There is hardware licensing available. We pay approximately $20,000 monthly to use the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LocalDB?

The solution is fast.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LocalDB?

It's free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LocalDB?

Technically speaking, you don't need to get any updates because it's not online. It's on-premise. So once it is installed, then you get a desktop-grade version. But the purpose of LocalDB is not th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Cloud Service?

Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Cloud Service?

The implementation process could be easier for customers. Although the general complexity makes it a seven out of ten, simplifying the process would greatly benefit users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Cloud Service?

I use Oracle Database Cloud Service for its scalability, advanced technology, and cost-effectiveness. My clients utilize this service for its excellent price and licensing options. I am an Oracle P...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs LocalDB

Compared 83% of the time

MySQL vs LocalDB

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs LocalDB

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Database In-Memory vs LocalDB

Compared 4% of the time

More LocalDB Competitors

Kinetica vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 52% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 48% of the time

More Oracle Database Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download LocalDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Oracle Database Cloud Service product report

Overview

LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.

Microsoft

Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service (Exadata Service) delivers the world's best Cloud Database Platform by combining the world's #1 database with Exadata, the most powerful database platform, and adding all the simplicity and cost effectiveness of the public cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

AstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero

Kagool, iPoint-Systems

Buyer's Guide

LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LocalDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.