Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LynxSecure Separation Kernel Hypervisor vs Trellix Embedded Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LynxSecure Separation Kerne...
Ranking in IoT Security
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Embedded Control
Ranking in IoT Security
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of LynxSecure Separation Kernel Hypervisor is 0.4%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Embedded Control is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Use LynxSecure Separation Kernel Hypervisor?
Share your opinion
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers DLP solutions with drive encryption, and application control
When installing McAfee ePO, we need to set up a self-check configuration. To join the system, we run a specific command. We configure connections for the data center, data server, and application server during this setup. Sometimes, we encounter communication issues between the database and application servers. These issues can prevent the database from communicating with ePO, leading to problems with updates and other functions. If the database cannot communicate with ePO, it affects our ability to manage configurations and updates, creating various issues. Additionally, roaming users outside the network must receive the latest signatures and updates. In a Citrix environment, a handler is configured to manage communication for these roaming users. However, we sometimes face issues with public and private IP configurations. Users may prefer to keep their IPs private, which can cause complications. For environments without Internet access, we use a DNS server to facilitate updates, which are managed locally. This type of configuration can be complex, but it's crucial for maintaining functionality without external network access. Trellix Embedded Control is a product used by companies in infrastructure development. The specific products and tools they use can vary based on their needs. DLP operates with devices, but network DLP is required for classification tasks. The choice of solutions depends on the organization's infrastructure and customer requirements, guiding the following implementation steps. Clients deploy the solution with their provider within one week.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix is expensive, depending on the organization's size and financial capacity. For some, it is economical and fits well with their infrastructure. Larger organizations may seek a high-quality p...
What needs improvement with Trellix Embedded Control?
Customers and organizations are aware of attacks in VPN environments and how to protect against them. Forensic investigations play a crucial role in understanding why such attacks occur and how the...
What is your primary use case for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix offers many products, such as DLP solutions for endpoint and network, drive encryption, and application control. It also provides robust endpoint security solutions. Furthermore, Trellix of...
 

Also Known As

LynxSecure
McAfee Embedded Control, Intel Security Controller, McAfee Controller
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ETAS Autosar Adaptive Platform
Kleberg Bank, Sicredi, Seagate, Loop Technology, Vidant Health, Xcel Energy, Cook County, Berkshire Health Systems, Mauser, China Pacific Insurance, Cologne-Bonn Airport, Bank Central Asia, Boston Medical Center, Boston Scientific
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Forescout, Armis and others in IoT Security. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.