No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nozomi Networks vs Trellix Embedded Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
Trellix Embedded Control
Ranking in IoT Security
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 15.4%, down from 31.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Embedded Control is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks15.4%
Trellix Embedded Control2.4%
Other82.2%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
Offers DLP solutions with drive encryption, and application control
When installing McAfee ePO, we need to set up a self-check configuration. To join the system, we run a specific command. We configure connections for the data center, data server, and application server during this setup. Sometimes, we encounter communication issues between the database and application servers. These issues can prevent the database from communicating with ePO, leading to problems with updates and other functions. If the database cannot communicate with ePO, it affects our ability to manage configurations and updates, creating various issues. Additionally, roaming users outside the network must receive the latest signatures and updates. In a Citrix environment, a handler is configured to manage communication for these roaming users. However, we sometimes face issues with public and private IP configurations. Users may prefer to keep their IPs private, which can cause complications. For environments without Internet access, we use a DNS server to facilitate updates, which are managed locally. This type of configuration can be complex, but it's crucial for maintaining functionality without external network access. Trellix Embedded Control is a product used by companies in infrastructure development. The specific products and tools they use can vary based on their needs. DLP operates with devices, but network DLP is required for classification tasks. The choice of solutions depends on the organization's infrastructure and customer requirements, guiding the following implementation steps. Clients deploy the solution with their provider within one week.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in ...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
We use Nozomi Networks as an intrusion detection system for OT deployments, automation systems, and IoT systems such as medical equipment to protect medical systems and smart meters. We detect any ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix is expensive, depending on the organization's size and financial capacity. For some, it is economical and fits well with their infrastructure. Larger organizations may seek a high-quality p...
What needs improvement with Trellix Embedded Control?
Customers and organizations are aware of attacks in VPN environments and how to protect against them. Forensic investigations play a crucial role in understanding why such attacks occur and how the...
What is your primary use case for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix offers many products, such as DLP solutions for endpoint and network, drive encryption, and application control. It also provides robust endpoint security solutions. Furthermore, Trellix of...
 

Also Known As

SCADAguardian
McAfee Embedded Control, Intel Security Controller, McAfee Controller
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Kleberg Bank, Sicredi, Seagate, Loop Technology, Vidant Health, Xcel Energy, Cook County, Berkshire Health Systems, Mauser, China Pacific Insurance, Cologne-Bonn Airport, Bank Central Asia, Boston Medical Center, Boston Scientific
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis, Nozomi, Palo Alto Networks and others in IoT Security. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.