Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Armis vs Trellix Embedded Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in IoT Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Trellix Embedded Control
Ranking in IoT Security
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Armis is 18.2%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Embedded Control is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a very good vulnerability monitoring system, but the implementation is challenging
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers DLP solutions with drive encryption, and application control
When installing McAfee ePO, we need to set up a self-check configuration. To join the system, we run a specific command. We configure connections for the data center, data server, and application server during this setup. Sometimes, we encounter communication issues between the database and application servers. These issues can prevent the database from communicating with ePO, leading to problems with updates and other functions. If the database cannot communicate with ePO, it affects our ability to manage configurations and updates, creating various issues. Additionally, roaming users outside the network must receive the latest signatures and updates. In a Citrix environment, a handler is configured to manage communication for these roaming users. However, we sometimes face issues with public and private IP configurations. Users may prefer to keep their IPs private, which can cause complications. For environments without Internet access, we use a DNS server to facilitate updates, which are managed locally. This type of configuration can be complex, but it's crucial for maintaining functionality without external network access. Trellix Embedded Control is a product used by companies in infrastructure development. The specific products and tools they use can vary based on their needs. DLP operates with devices, but network DLP is required for classification tasks. The choice of solutions depends on the organization's infrastructure and customer requirements, guiding the following implementation steps. Clients deploy the solution with their provider within one week.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Armis?
Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.
What needs improvement with Armis?
There isn't anything specific that needs improvement.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I used it for asset management in my cybersecurity training program called CyberNow Labs. It was used during security operations and investigations to identify assets within our CNL network and to ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix is expensive, depending on the organization's size and financial capacity. For some, it is economical and fits well with their infrastructure. Larger organizations may seek a high-quality p...
What needs improvement with Trellix Embedded Control?
Customers and organizations are aware of attacks in VPN environments and how to protect against them. Forensic investigations play a crucial role in understanding why such attacks occur and how the...
What is your primary use case for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix offers many products, such as DLP solutions for endpoint and network, drive encryption, and application control. It also provides robust endpoint security solutions. Furthermore, Trellix of...
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Embedded Control, Intel Security Controller, McAfee Controller
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Kleberg Bank, Sicredi, Seagate, Loop Technology, Vidant Health, Xcel Energy, Cook County, Berkshire Health Systems, Mauser, China Pacific Insurance, Cologne-Bonn Airport, Bank Central Asia, Boston Medical Center, Boston Scientific
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.