Magic xpi Integration Platform vs Mule ESB comparison

The compared Magic Software and Salesforce solutions aren't in the same category. Magic Software is ranked #23 in PaaS , and holds a 0.4% mindshare in the category. Salesforce is ranked #2 in E , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 25.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution.

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Read 1 Magic xpi Integration Platform review

84 Views
68 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mule ESB

Read 49 Mule ESB reviews

5,021 Views
4,168 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Mule ESB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Average Rating

3.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (23rd)

Mule ESB

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Magic xpi Integration Platform is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, down 0.4% compared to last year.
Mule ESB, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 25.4% mindshare, up 24.6% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

it_user977634

Enterprise IT Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A low-performing integration tool

We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Read full review

PurbayanSaha

Technology Consultant at Ernst & Young

Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs

There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is OK."

"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."

"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."

"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."

"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."

"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."

"I am impressed with the product's connectors and scalability."

"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."

"The solution offers multiple deployment options."

More Mule ESB pros

Cons

"It is not performing well."

"It should have some amount of logging."

"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."

"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."

"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."

"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."

"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."

"In India, particularly in the banking sector, clients do not prefer cloud solutions due to regulatory and compliance requirements."

"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."

More Mule ESB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."

"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."

"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."

"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."

"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."

"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."

More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Retailer

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company

I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...

See all answers

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?

Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mule ESB?

The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 33% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB

Compared 6% of the time

More Mule ESB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

December 2024

Download Magic xpi Integration Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Mule ESB

December 2024

Download Mule ESB product report

Also Known As

Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT

No data available

Learn More

Magic Software

Salesforce

Overview

Magic xpi Integration Platform is a total solution for integrating, automating and transforming the data of your business applications. The intuitive and easy-to-use interface, including 100+ pre-built connectors, makes it ideal for all types of users, from business users and citizen integrators to IT experts. Magic’s end-to-end tailored solutions are a great fit for all types of IT infrastructures, supporting all of the on-premise, cloud and hybrid integration needs of organizations around the world.

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Sample Customers

Godrej Properties

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.