Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Managed Methods JaxView vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix comparison

Managed Methods and TIBCO are both solutions in the SOA Governance category. Managed Methods is ranked #11, while TIBCO is ranked #4. Managed Methods holds a 1.7% mindshare in SG, compared to TIBCO’s 9.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution.
Managed Methods JaxView
  • 44 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
TIBCO ActiveMatrix
  • 69 Views
  • 57 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Managed Methods JaxView and TIBCO ActiveMatrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SOA Governance Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SOA Governance
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Managed Methods JaxView
Ranking in SOA Governance
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO ActiveMatrix
Ranking in SOA Governance
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the SOA Governance category, the mindshare of Managed Methods JaxView is 1.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix is 9.7%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SOA Governance
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which solution do you prefer: TIBCO ActiveMatrix or Camunda?
Here are the reasons many prefer Camunda over TIBCO ActiveMatrix: Camunda is an open-source project that is free to use and modify, saving you money and giving you more flexibility. It has a larg...
See all answers
Buyer's Guide
SOA Governance
January 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SOA Governance
January 2025
Managed Methods JaxView reportDownload Managed Methods JaxView product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Server
January 2025
TIBCO ActiveMatrix reportDownload TIBCO ActiveMatrix product report
 

Also Known As

JaxView
ActiveMatrix
 

Learn More

Managed Methods
TIBCO
 

Overview

JaxView from Managed Methods is a versatile tool for Web services management and runtime governance of service-oriented environments.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.
 

Sample Customers

McLaren, Orlando Utilities Commission, MedAssets, Meridian Health Plan, Trust Co of America, Merkle Inc., United Natural Foods
Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)
Buyer's Guide
SOA Governance
January 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.