Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mend.io vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Mend.io enhances security and efficiency, managing open-source components, reducing vulnerabilities, boosting compliance, and increasing potential sales growth.
Sentiment score
8.2
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances efficiency, cuts costs, reduces incidents, boosts growth, and saves labor costs through automation.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
Improvements to our security infrastructure contributed to overall business growth of approximately 150 percent over the past year.
By automating tasks, it significantly reduces the human resources required, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
It has reduced the number of development and scripting hours along with maintenance hours.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Mend.io provides highly responsive customer service with excellent technical support and proactive communication, despite minor reseller process challenges.
Sentiment score
7.9
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management support is highly rated for its expertise, promptness, and effective issue resolution, enhancing user satisfaction.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
The support team was knowledgeable and offered a variety of quick resolution options.
Their SMEs have sufficient knowledge, and if they are not the right contact, they quickly redirect us to someone who can help resolve issues.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Mend.io offers impressive scalability for large projects and users, with stable performance and effective integration with CI/CD tools.
Sentiment score
8.7
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is praised for seamless scalability, efficiently managing global environments and integrating new features effortlessly.
We have about 300,000 assets installed with agents worldwide.
Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management has proven to be a highly scalable solution for us over the past couple of years.
Qualys CSAM is highly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Mend.io is generally stable and reliable, addressing occasional slowdowns swiftly, though some face pipeline integration challenges.
Sentiment score
8.2
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers reliable performance, minor syncing delays post-updates, and consistently seamless reports and scans.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
I would rate the stability of Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten.
They are constantly adding capabilities.
This platform demonstrates excellent stability with consistent 100 percent uptime and no glitches observed.
 

Room For Improvement

Mend.io users desire enhanced integration, interface improvements, better scanning, customizable reports, and expanded support for tools and languages.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management should enhance integrations, reduce costs, and improve customization, UI, asset tagging, and learning resources.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
Qualys is currently not able to identify assets lacking DNS information.
Features enhancing the interaction with IT or security teams should be added, such as a ticketing feature that, if an issue arises in the CSAM module, enables direct ticket creation in systems like ServiceNow.
We would prefer more options, such as 'approved only for pilot' or 'approved for this line of business,' allowing for better granularity in categorizing software.
 

Setup Cost

Mend.io provides cost-effective pricing with fixed developer fees, appealing to enterprises for affordability and negotiable terms.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers excellent value for large enterprises with transparent, flexible pricing despite some cost concerns.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
A cost-effective solution.
A monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included.
Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase.
 

Valuable Features

Mend.io streamlines governance and enhances security by efficiently detecting vulnerabilities and integrating with DevOps workflows.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in real-time visibility, asset discovery, third-party integration, and efficient cybersecurity operations with dynamic tools.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
By correlating this with QDS scores, we can accurately assess the risk level of high or low QDS scores associated with each asset and monitor them accordingly.
The most valuable feature is the real-time visibility Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides into all assets across our development and operational environments.
It also performs scans to identify any vulnerabilities, which helps to take proactive measures before those vulnerabilities are identified by any attacker.
 

Categories and Ranking

Mend.io
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (18th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Static Code Analysis (4th)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
5th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (10th), Patch Management (7th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Mend.io is 14.7%, down from 21.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 1.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables smooth management of vulnerabilities and promotes a shift towards a culture of security
We have witnessed Mend.io for its high stability, consistently living up to our expectations in terms of performance and reliability. Our developers have reported very few issues and almost minimal to zero downtime, which is a critical factor for our organization to rely on Mend SCA to secure our applications. We didn't experience any major issues in the stability of the product. This level of dependability is crucial for our hundreds of development teams that need to maintain continuous integration and deployment processes without interruptions. We realize the solution's architecture is designed to support a wide range of use cases, making it suitable for organizations of varying sizes and complexities. As a SaaS (Software as a Service) offering, Mend.io eliminates the need for physical server management, which further contributes to its stability. Users can access the platform without worrying about hardware failures or maintenance issues that can affect on-premises solutions. Moreover, Mend.io's integration capabilities with existing workflows—including IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines—enhance its stability by providing a seamless user experience. This integration allows teams to incorporate security scanning into their development processes without significant disruptions, which is often a challenge with less stable solutions. Feedback from our developers and architects highlights the tool's effectiveness in reducing open-source software vulnerabilities while maintaining a streamlined development lifecycle. Our organization have experienced improved code quality and faster incident response times as a result of using Mend.io. The platform's intuitive dashboard and management views are also praised by our developers for their usability, contributing to a positive user experience. In short, Mend.io stands out as a dependable and reliable solution in the realm of software composition analysis. Its high stability, combined with robust integration capabilities and user-friendly features, makes it an excellent choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture while minimizing operational disruptions.
Revathi VeeraRaghavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides comprehensive visibility and covers the complete attack surface
For some of the software, there was no life cycle or general information. We wanted them to give details in the database as and when the software comes. I raised a ticket for that, and after that, they updated the details for more than one million software. They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that. When we click on the web application, it only shows potential web assets. The application details are not there. Overall, CSAM has matured a lot. These are the few enhancements that need to be done.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?
We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...
What do you like most about Mend.io?
The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution.
What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
Qualys is continually developing, adding new features each year. Previously, there was no on-demand scan feature in a cloud agent, but multiple features have since been added to my cloud agent modu...
What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
I have been working with Qualys for approximately two and a half years. I have used this module to manage security postures in cloud environments, and it is essentially used for hybrid management s...
 

Also Known As

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Mend.io vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.