We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Being cloud-based saves the provisioning aspect of an on-premises solution."
"One feature I like in Microsoft Azure is its ability to host and run applications on virtual machines. It is a basic yet crucial capability for our team."
"Being able to set up, change and configure VMs is easy - a lot easier than in AWS."
"Its scalability is valuable. Depending on our requirements, we can add as many virtual machines as we want. We are able to get high availability for services. Services are always available, and they have the maximum uptime. If there is any issue with one of the services, another service is always available. It is pay-as-you-go. You don't have to spend any money upfront. You use the service and pay after one month or a couple of hours of use."
"The tool's most valuable aspect is the account management side. This involves tasks such as assigning credentials to different individuals, managing user accounts, and implementing Privileged Access Management."
"The solution's technical support was very good."
"The performance is good."
"I have found Microsoft Azure to be stable. We have large corporate customers and it is working great."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."
"I would prefer Microsoft Azure to increase the free trial, then developers can take advantage, and it could increase their sales."
"There are so many services available that the interface is a little bit messy, and when you're looking for a specific service, you have to know exactly where to search."
"Its costing can be improved. There should be better cost management."
"Microsoft Azure could improve by being more secure."
"I would want Microsoft Azure to provide some credits that can be used to test and validate Microsoft’s different solutions since it is an area where the product lacks."
"It would be nice to have faster support."
"I don't understand why we spend so much time and money on Azure when Microsoft relies on third-party companies for support in the CSP model. I don't know how the support model works within Microsoft, but giving it to poor-performing third-party companies is not ideal."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Pantheon is most compared with Amazon AWS, Acquia Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.