Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mule ESB vs SWIFT InterAct comparison

The compared Salesforce and SWIFT solutions aren't in the same category. Salesforce is ranked #2 in E , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 25.2% mindshare in the category. SWIFT is ranked #11 in BBM , and holds a 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution.
Mule ESB
Read 47 Mule ESB reviews
  • 5,351 Views
  • 4,451 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
SWIFT InterAct
  • 712 Views
  • 630 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and SWIFT InterAct based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)
SWIFT InterAct
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Mule ESB is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 25.2%, up 24.9% compared to last year.
SWIFT InterAct, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 7.6% mindshare, down 8.1% since last year.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 9, 2024
Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs
We're using our Mule ESB mostly for integration projects for multinational companies that do business on a B2C or B2B basis. We also work with companies with multiple third-party vendors employed under their payroll. The Mule ESB helps integrate data from third-party systems or vendors with the…
Read full review
Use SWIFT InterAct?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
"The pricing must be improved."
"Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
"The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."
"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."
"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."
"Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other factors. Large customers benefit from more flexibility in implementation and renewal compared to smaller ones."
More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
60%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
See all answers
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
See all answers
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 33% of the time
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 11% of the time
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
webMethods.io vs Mule ESB Logo
webMethods.io vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB Logo
Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
More Mule ESB Competitors
SWIFTnet FIN vs SWIFT InterAct Logo
SWIFTnet FIN vs SWIFT InterAct
Compared 100% of the time
More SWIFT InterAct Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mule ESB
October 2024
Mule ESB reportDownload Mule ESB product report
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
October 2024
SWIFT InterAct reportDownload SWIFT InterAct product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
InterAct
 

Learn More

Salesforce
SWIFT
 

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.

 

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Seceti
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.