MySQL vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

MySQL and Oracle Database In-Memory are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.3. MySQL holds a 8.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Database In-Memory’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle Database In-Memory users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,825 Views
6,096 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 31 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

1,029 Views
828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Database In-Memory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Database In-Memory target different segments of the database market. MySQL holds an advantage in widespread web application usage due to its cost-effectiveness and open-source nature, whereas Oracle Database In-Memory is preferred for its robust performance in analytics and mixed workloads within enterprises.

Features: MySQL offers a multi-threaded architecture, high SQL compatibility, and robust community support. It integrates seamlessly with LAMP/WAMP stacks. Oracle Database In-Memory includes features such as columnar storage and superior real-time performance for complex analytics and transactions. It is designed with enterprise needs in mind.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could enhance its InnoDB complexity and performance for transactions and large databases, along with adding advanced features like active directory integration. Oracle Database In-Memory could reduce its high costs and simplify its complex setup and data replication processes to improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL is flexible in deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, favored by SMBs for cost-effectiveness. It benefits from extensive community support. Oracle Database In-Memory is primarily used in enterprise high-performance environments with structured support, though it involves costly service agreements outside North America.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is attractive for its open-source model, lower initial costs, and potential for high ROI due to minimal deployment expenses, suiting SMBs without extensive support needs. Oracle Database In-Memory incurs higher costs with substantial licensing fees, offering justified ROI mainly for large enterprises with complex data processing requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Database In-Memory

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Md Al-Amin

Senior System Analyst at Thakral

Ensures that users experience a good return on investment

Firstly, a user should prepare the operating system for installation, and then we have to copy the software to install the product. When dealing with scenarios related to Oracle Real Application Clusters, users need to add nodes and storage. The setup process is a little bit complex compared to DB2. The setup process of Oracle Database In-Memory takes around five to six hours to install Oracle Real Application Clusters, if everything is okay, apart from which the other processes will take a day. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The cloud-based solution is available for testing and development, and it need not be installed in your environment. A user just needs to do a few clicks and select the database, after which it automatically gets installed in the cloud. Only in the on-premises version of the product, there is a need to do some work in the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly."

"The solution is great for small applications in particular."

"MySQL gives us a very user-friendly workspace in which to query the database."

"MySQL's clustering features are very strong, and you can automate scripting, so that helps. We wrote a Terraform script and ran it."

"The most valuable feature of MySQL is auto-scaling."

"Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database."

"The deployment process is pretty fast."

"It is a scalable solution."

More MySQL pros

"We find the dashboard and the speed of data processing very valuable in Oracle Database In-Memory."

"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."

"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."

"I find the performance features of Oracle Database In-Memory to be most beneficial."

"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."

"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"

"The solution's most valuable feature is its performance optimization within our hardware environment."

"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

Cons

"There are some issues with compatibility with Java environments that need to be improved. When Oracle bought this solution there were some driver changes that caused some issues with operations."

"The manuals or documentation could be better."

"MySQL could be improved by adding more automation."

"Its scalability can be better. It is probably not as scalable as Oracle. I had some issues with connectors. I used it from a C++ program, and it required some work to make it run, but finally, it worked."

"This solution needs to be improved when it comes to working with desktop applications on the developer side."

"The workbench could be improved. In particular, error messages can be improved, which are horrific and completely unhelpful. I'd like to see improved parsing of errors. When you write SQL and it crashes, it usually is something completely irrelevant and not helpful. I've started to use GPT 3.5 for finding out how to do things. I got to do something a bit different, and that I found to be very useful. If there was some way to tie it into one of the new AI tools, that would probably be a good idea."

"As for areas that could be improved, the tool is often used as a local database on laptops. But now, we're moving to cloud-based solutions that are more scalable and highly available. I think the tool should offer a cloud database option. This would let users keep a local copy of data if needed, but also have their data available across different regions through a cloud account."

"When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version."

More MySQL cons

"Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region."

"The dashboard requires some refreshment or configuration improvements."

"Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management."

"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

"They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive."

"The product could benefit from enhancements in its graphical user interface."

"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a community version."

"I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."

"I am not paying, but I am not sure about the exact licensing requirements."

"We are using the free version of MySQL. We prefer paying for a yearly license."

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"We are using the free community version of the solution."

"The tool is open source."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

"The solution's pricing is high."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."

"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory is very expensive. Additionally, there are extra costs for some features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

The dashboard requires some refreshment or configuration improvements. Also, the pricing could be addressed.

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 16% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 28% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 15% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 13% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 10% of the time

InterSystems Caché vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

March 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

March 2025

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Shanghai Customs

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

March 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.