Nagios Core vs NetCrunch comparison

Nagios and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Nagios is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while AdRem Software is ranked #77. Nagios holds a 3.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Nagios Core

Read 50 Nagios Core reviews

4,671 Views
3,482 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

397 Views
330 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Nagios Core compete in network monitoring solutions. NetCrunch seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and comprehensive support.

Features: NetCrunch offers an intuitive interface, automated network discovery, and a range of built-in monitoring tools. Nagios Core provides plugin extensibility, advanced scripting capabilities, and adapts to complex environments.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch could improve in areas such as scalability, customization options, and reducing initial setup costs. Nagios Core might enhance by simplifying its interface, offering more structured support, and streamlining the configuration process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch has a straightforward deployment process with extensive support resources, simplifying setup for various infrastructures. Nagios Core requires more manual configuration and relies heavily on community support.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch incurs higher initial setup costs but offers a clear ROI with its integrated features. Nagios Core, being open-source, has lower initial costs but might require additional investments in time for setup and maintenance.

To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,071 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

64th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (26th), Log Management (72nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it offers proper alerting capabilities."

"The solution is quite efficient."

"Nagios Core is very configurable. Whatever you want, you can do it."

"Alert calls occur anytime a service goes down or a matrix is difficult and that helps us to quickly restore service and transfer work."

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."

"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."

"Dashboard provides monitor of total assets."

"I like that it's very simple to install, easy to manage and deploy, and easy to use for monitoring."

More Nagios Core pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"The core version is no match for the XI version."

"The tool needs to improve the integrations."

"I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future."

"We're using the free version, which limits us in terms of the things that we can do. If we had the paid version, a lot of our issues would probably go away. For example, we can't isolate instances that are being built or updated with the production ones. When they're being built, on Nagios, they're showing in red. It'd be nice to be able to partition those off until they're all green, and then we can bring them into the environment. This is probably because we've got the free version and not the paid version. If we went for the paid version, it would probably allow us to do exactly what we want to or remove the restrictions that we have, but if we are able to isolate instances in the free version, it would make life much easier."

"The interface could be improved."

"It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through."

"The alerting mechanism in Nagios Core could be improved."

"The dashboard and monitoring features could be improved."

More Nagios Core cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"We are using the free version."

"Nagios Core is a cheap solution."

"It's free."

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."

"Nagios Core is free to use."

"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Non Profit

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 22% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 16% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 10% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 100% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

January 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Learn More

Nagios

Video not available

AdRem Software

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch

January 2025

Free Report: Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.