Nagios Core vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service comparison

Nagios and Oracle are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Nagios is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #42 with an average rating of 9.0. Nagios holds a 3.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Oracle’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,301 Views
3,307 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Read 1 Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service review

370 Views
328 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nagios Core and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (8th)

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

42nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Saktid Devi Jeyakaran

Associate Cloud Engineer at Ebizoncloud LLC

Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database

It's primarily for CPU utilization and resource monitoring. Vulnerability scanning falls under OCI Cloud Guard, so it's related to security concerns. Some people might prefer using a third-party tool for more enhanced features. However, I think Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service could be improved to reduce the need for third-party connectivity. So overall, third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service. OCI needs more research and development to understand why clients choose third-party tools like Splunk or QRadar over internal monitoring solutions. There must be some areas where third-party tools are better. OCI could analyze this and improve its service.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

"We use the product to monitor server applications."

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."

"Alert calls occur anytime a service goes down or a matrix is difficult and that helps us to quickly restore service and transfer work."

"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."

"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."

"The most valuable features are the reports and the way it generates the report in a graphical manner."

"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."

More Nagios Core pros

"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."

Cons

"The mapping is a little hard."

"Making it a little easier to configure and set up from the start would help. There are multiple layers that you have to wade through to be able to set it up, to do it the right way, and to get it to do what you want it to do."

"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier."

"The dashboard and monitoring features could be improved."

"Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers."

"The alerting mechanism in Nagios Core could be improved."

"Bandwidth monitoring is the pain point for me because Nagios Core does not monitor bandwidth effectively like Cacti does."

"I would like to see more training videos."

More Nagios Core cons

"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"Nagios Core is a cheap solution."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."

"It's free."

"The solution is expensive."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

"For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Media Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis. However, there are monthly licensing options available as well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 27% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 19% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 15% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Zabbix vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 42% of the time

Datadog vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 36% of the time

More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

March 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2025

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service product report

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is a software-as-a-service solution that monitors the status and health of your entire IT infrastructure - on-premises or on the cloud - from a single platform. Proactive monitoring across all your infrastructure tiers enables you to be alerted on issues, troubleshoot and resolve these before they impact end users.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.