NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS comparison

Why PeerSpot?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is ranked #36. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP holds a 6.0% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

11,286 Views
2,257 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 1 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS review

1,166 Views
396 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, IBM and others in Cloud Migration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Migration

2nd

Ranking in Cloud Storage

7th

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (25th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

36th

Ranking in Cloud Storage

36th

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.0%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.0%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS	1.3%
Other	92.7%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

reviewer2039379

Solution Architect at a university with 10,001+ employees

Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication

The local libraries from NetApp to NetApp are good. This way, we don't have to put the middleman in between to do the transition or conversion. The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful. In terms of the integration with AWS native services, I did not configure it by myself. There was another team who did it. That said, I presume they didn't run into any issues, which is why we are using it. While the solution did not help us reduce the amount of storage, it allowed us to have data replicated across on-premises and in the cloud, so that we have a backup in DR. While it did not reduce the footprint, it helped DR expansion. It increased redundancy. Since deploying the product, we have not been affected by ransomware or other external threats.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."

"CVO gives us the ability to access data as quickly as possible, which is critical because of the mission set we handle. Some things cannot wait. For example, we tried having the data in the cloud itself, but it took too long for us to retrieve it from cold or deep storage. If we have it ONTAP or on-prem, it's so much easier to pull it within minutes."

"One thing I have noticed is that it is very simple to move the data where we need to move it, delete it, or archive it if we need to archive it to StorageGRID."

"The feature which I like the most is that it has the capabilities that the traditional storage system offers. It provides all the functionality. The deduplication and compression work exactly like ONTAP's traditional storage. So people who have experience with that find it very easy to manage."

"One of the most valuable features is its similarity to the physical app, which makes it familiar. It's almost identical to a real NetApp, which means you can run all of the associated NetApp processes and services with it. Otherwise, we would definitely have to deploy some hardware on a site somewhere, which could be a challenge in terms of CapEx."

"Its features help us to have a backup of our volumes using the native technology of NetApp ONTAP, so we do not have to invest in other solutions for our backup requirement, and it also helps us to replicate the data to another geographic location, which saves us on the costs of backup products and gives us flexible storage."

"It manages our environments with a single purview of data management, especially as each variant of ONTAP uses identical metadata and file system formats."

"The fast recovery time objective with the ability to bring the environment back to production in case something happens."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."

Cons

"Some of the licensing is a little kludgy. We just created an HA environment in Azure and their licensing for SVMs per node is a little kludgy. They're working on it right now."

"Cloud Volumes ONTAP's interface could use an overhaul. Sometimes you have to dig around in Cloud Manager a little bit to find certain things. The layout could be more intuitive."

"The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service."

"It definitely needs improvement with respect to clustering and with respect to more collaborative integrations with Azure."

"The automated deployment was a bit complex using the public APIs. When we had to deploy Cloud Volumes ONTAP on a regular basis using automation, It could be a bit of a challenge."

"How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically."

"It definitely needs improvement with respect to clustering and with respect to more collaborative integrations with Azure. Right now, we have very limited functionalities with Azure, except for storage. If CVO could be integrated with Azure that would help. When there is any sort of maintenance happening in the cloud, it disrupts the service in Cloud Volumes ONTAP."

"We've just been dealing with general pre-requisite infrastructure configuration challenges. Once those are out of the way, it is easy."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage..."

"Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost."

"We purchased the product directly from NetApp."

"Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have."

"We find the pricing to be favorable due to the educational sector we belong to."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 2% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Amazon S3 Glacier vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 21% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 5% of the time

Google Workspace vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

October 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

October 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Cloud Volumes Service for AWS, NetApp CVS for AWS, CVS for AWS

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS offers a robust, scalable cloud storage solution designed to meet advanced storage needs on AWS. It enables seamless data management with exemplary performance, making it an excellent choice for demanding workloads.

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is engineered to provide enterprise-grade storage that integrates natively with AWS. It delivers superior performance for high demanding applications with features like rapid data cloning, multiprotocol support, and advanced data protection. Designed for adaptability, it serves diverse industries with precision, ensuring reliable data management and quick deployment.

What are the key features of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS?

Multi-Protocol Support: Offers NFS, SMB, and dual-protocol access.
Data Protection: Includes snapshots and cloning for backup and recovery.
High Performance: Delivers low-latency storage for demanding workloads.
Seamless Integration: Works effortlessly with AWS services and environments.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to increasing data storage requirements.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes expenditure through tailored pricing models.
Reliability: Ensures consistent uptime with robust backup options.
Flexibility: Supports multiple cloud architectures and services.

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS plays a crucial role in industries like finance, healthcare, and media by streamlining data-heavy applications and ensuring compliance with stringent data management regulations. Its adaptability allows companies to leverage data workflows efficiently, ensuring optimized performance in industry-specific scenarios.

NetApp

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors, best Cloud Storage vendors, and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.