Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros and cons

Vendor: NetApp
4.4 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
485 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers operational recovery through Snapshot copies and thin clones, enabling easy restoration of critical data. Multiprotocol support allows simultaneous access for Linux and Windows clients. Features like cloud replication, deduplication, and compression support efficient data management. Unified storage across file and block storage ensures consistent operations. Storage tiering, SnapMirror, and workload transitions from on-premises to cloud environments highlight advanced capabilities, despite challenges in multi-region support and automated deployment using public APIs.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides efficient operational recovery through Snapshot copies and thin clones, allowing easy restoration of data.
It offers multiprotocol support, enabling simultaneous access to data for both Linux and Windows clients, which enhances flexibility and access in cloud environments.
The fast recovery time objectives contribute to minimal downtime, quickly bringing environments back to production in case of incidents.
Features like data replication, deduplication, and compression are integral for cloud adaptations, aiding in efficient data management and cost-effective storage strategies.
Its similarity to physical NetApp systems makes it familiar to users, lowering the learning curve and simplifying transitions between on-premises and cloud settings.

CONS

How it handles erasure coding could be improved, specifically in terms of seamlessness and avoiding interruptions due to hardware issues.
It is limited to AWS and Azure, and should also support Google Cloud for more flexibility in choosing cloud storage providers.
Its upgrades and management are not very efficient, with complex automated deployment using public APIs.
Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult from the client-side, needing a simpler configuration solution.
There is a hard limit on disk capacity, currently about 360 terabytes or 36 disks, which is restrictive and needs improvement.
 

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pros review quotes

JH
Jul 29, 2019
Unified Manager, System Manager, and Cloud Manager are all GUI-based. It's easy for somebody who has not been exposed to this for years to pick it up and work with it.
Read full review
CG
Jul 18, 2019
NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well.
Read full review
PR
Oct 29, 2019
The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
December 2024
Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1380831 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 2, 2020
One of the most valuable features is its similarity to the physical app, which makes it familiar. It's almost identical to a real NetApp, which means you can run all of the associated NetApp processes and services with it. Otherwise, we would definitely have to deploy some hardware on a site somewhere, which could be a challenge in terms of CapEx.
Read full review
AS
Jul 22, 2020
The feature which I like the most is that it has the capabilities that the traditional storage system offers. It provides all the functionality. The deduplication and compression work exactly like ONTAP's traditional storage. So people who have experience with that find it very easy to manage.
Read full review
reviewer1376757 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 11, 2020
With NetApp, you can integrate malware scanning or malware protection. This is something valuable that is not offered in SaaS solutions typically.
Read full review
JH
Nov 2, 2020
We're able to use the SnapMirror function and SnapMirror data from our on-prem environment into Azure. That is super-helpful. SnapMirror allows you to take data that exists on one NetApp, on a physical NetApp storage platform, and copy it over to another NetApp storage platform. It's a solid, proven technology, so we don't worry about whether data is getting lost or corrupted during the SnapMirror.
Read full review
SG
Oct 29, 2020
The storage tiering is definitely the most valuable feature... With respect to tiering, the inactive data is pushed to a lower tier where the storage cost is cheap, but the access cost is high.
Read full review
John Boncamper - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2022
The Cloud Manager application that's on the NetApp cloud site is easy to use. You can set up and schedule replications from there, so you don't have to go into the ONTAP system. Another feature we've recently started using is the scheduled power off. We started with one client and have been slowly implementing it with others. We can cut costs by not having the VM run all the time. It's only on when it's doing replication, but it powers off after.
Read full review
ES
Jul 2, 2019
The FlexClones make all the management easier for us.
Read full review
Show 10 more reviews (out of 60)
 

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Cons review quotes

JH
Jul 29, 2019
Some of the licensing is a little kludgy. We just created an HA environment in Azure and their licensing for SVMs per node is a little kludgy. They're working on it right now.
Read full review
CG
Jul 18, 2019
Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair.
Read full review
PR
Oct 29, 2019
How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
December 2024
Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1380831 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 2, 2020
There is room for improvement with the capacity. There's a very hard limit to how many disks you can have and how much space you can have. That is something they should work to fix, because it's limiting. Right now, the limit is about 360 terabytes or 36 disks.
Read full review
AS
Jul 22, 2020
When it comes to a critical or a read-write-intensive application, it doesn't provide the performance that some applications require, especially for SAP. The SAP HANA database has a write-latency of less than 2 milliseconds and the CVO solution does not fit there. It could be used for other databases, where the requirements are not so demanding, especially when it comes to write-latency.
Read full review
reviewer1376757 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 11, 2020
If they could include clustering together multiple physical Cloud Volumes ONTAP devices as an option, that could be helpful.
Read full review
JH
Nov 2, 2020
When Azure does their maintenance, they do maintenance on one node at a time. With the two nodes of the CVO, it can automatically fail over from one node to the node that is staying up. And when the first node comes back online, it will fail back to the first node. We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly.
Read full review
SG
Oct 29, 2020
It definitely needs improvement with respect to clustering and with respect to more collaborative integrations with Azure. Right now, we have very limited functionalities with Azure, except for storage. If CVO could be integrated with Azure that would help. When there is any sort of maintenance happening in the cloud, it disrupts the service in Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
Read full review
John Boncamper - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2022
Cloud Volumes ONTAP's interface could use an overhaul. Sometimes you have to dig around in Cloud Manager a little bit to find certain things. The layout could be more intuitive.
Read full review
ES
Jul 2, 2019
The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...
Read full review
Show 10 more reviews (out of 57)

Product Categories

Product Categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage
Cloud Migration
Cloud Storage
Cloud Backup
Public Cloud Storage Services

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
IBM Spectrum Scale vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
IBM Spectrum Scale vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage
Cloud Migration
Cloud Storage
Cloud Backup
Public Cloud Storage Services

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
IBM Spectrum Scale vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
IBM Spectrum Scale vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
See all alternatives
Related questions
  • 18
What are your top 3 Cloud Storage predictions for 2022?