Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp SnapMirror vs NetApp Snapshot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapMirror
Ranking in Data Replication
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp Snapshot
Ranking in Data Replication
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 19.7%, up from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Snapshot is 23.7%, up from 21.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Christopher Cagayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects our data during any emergency or disaster
If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great. Once we bought a license for NetApp AFF A250, but the company didn’t include SnapMirror, which lead to issues while transferring data. We had to reach out to the vendor again which lead to logistical issues. It was quite frustrating as we had already incorporated the product cost into the budget, and it is quite difficult to include it again. That was a bad experience.
Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers point-in-time copy functionality, restore process is very fast, and the resources are easy to configure
Snapshot doesn't work well when you're already backing up data with another software. For example, if a customer has backup software in their environment and wants to use Snapshot alongside it, that won't work effectively. It will bubble up back-end storage space. Also, if a customer frequently deletes data, Snapshot will take up a lot of space. For example, if they write one terabyte of data and delete it at the end of the day, and then rewrite it the next day, scheduling a snapshot in that scenario will cause it to take up a lot of space. So, in scenarios where you need data protection, you have to use NetApp Snapshot exclusively and not use any other product for that. Secondly, where there's a lot of data deletion or overwriting, NetApp's Snapshot will not be an effective way to provide backup and recovery. I've told a lot of my customers this because I've seen the problems firsthand. They call me saying their storage is full, and I find that they are deleting and then copying the data repeatedly. I ask them why they're doing it, and they say it's their daily work to archive, delete, and copy. So I have to disable the Snapshot and tell them that if they're already copying the data with other tools and deleting it, then the data isn't important, and they don't need a snapshot or backup of it. For additional features: NetApp is already a visionary company. They analyze their deployed products and change them according to customer requirements. To me, it's not about technical improvement, but the price factor is important for selling the product. So, the price factor is challenging. Snapshot is a ten out of ten. If the whole product needs improvement, I think one feature they could add is an alarm or notification in the NetApp management console if you're frequently deleting data or using a volume for backups. The alarm would indicate that you don't need to enable Snapshot in that case. That kind of alarm, notification, or indication could be added. If a customer is deleting data very frequently, there should be a mechanism to notify the administrator. A message should be triggered if the customer has enabled Snapshot, advising them to disable it, as it will use unnecessary storage. This would be a helpful feature. Otherwise, administrators or deployers should know to discuss this with the customer during deployment. They should advise the customer not to enable Snapshot on volumes where they frequently delete and copy or archive data.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."
"Compared to the traditional way we did backups, with Snapshot it takes us less time. It has improved my organization by saving us time."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"SnapMirror and Snapshot are both very reliable products."
"The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features."
"The most valuable features of NetApp Snapshot are the integration with other vendors and customization."
"You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"It centralizes your data."
 

Cons

"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The GUI can be improved to perform complex tasks"
"They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product."
"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"Although support is good, the global support is lacking depending on location."
"Not a perfect ten because there is one point off to give it room for improvement."
"The solution should have a snapshot mode using AI to decide when to create the snapshot, depending on the workload."
"The price could be a bit lower."
"I would like to see cloud features added to the next release of this solution."
"The price could be improved a little bit."
"The next release should include developments on the step center for purpose or bandwidth."
"The dashboards are in need of improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."
"The product price is reasonable."
"The pricing can be improved."
"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."
"It's a highly cost-effective solution"
"The pricing could be improved."
"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."
"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."
"It's not too expensive."
"Snapshot is free and comes with the NetApp storage software. It's purely free of cost."
"NetApp Snapshot is expensive since you need to buy an additional premium license for it which is an extra cost over the payments made for NetApp...The license works during the entire life cycle of NetApp Snapshot."
"The price of this solution is fair."
"If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release."
"The price of the solution is reasonable but could improve. However, if you are in a country that has a poor currency then the price will be considered expensive."
"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."
"The price of NetApp Snapshot depends on the use case. They charge by how much data you need, the capability, and for snap licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?
The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.
What method of data replication does NetApp Snapshot use?
Here's a breakdown of how the data replication by NetApp Snapshot works: it's through the snapshot replication method. What does that mean? Well, in simple words, the software creates copies of dat...
What is the storage scale of NetApp Snapshot?
Last time I checked, the NetApp Snapshot data replication software could go up to 255 snapshot copies. I'm not sure how familiar you are with similar software, but that's a pretty good number. It g...
Will NetApp Snapshot recover data in an emergency?
Well yes, the snapshots that NetApp Snapshot creates are your backup. But then there's also their feature for advanced backup. This allows you to copy backups to offline locations and also make arc...
 

Also Known As

SnapMirror
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Mazda
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapMirror vs. NetApp Snapshot and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.