NetApp SnapMirror Reviews

Organizations find it challenging to quantify ROI without direct revenue impact, but NetApp SnapMirror, when designed for high availability, backup, and disaster recovery, offers clear ROI. Users appreciate the unified storage of SAN and NAS, enhancing service availability with redundant components. Key advantages are data replication, transfer, backup, and restoration, offering essential secondary data copies for developers during emergencies.

Many users perceive NetApp SnapMirror pricing to vary widely based on implementation size, sometimes exceeding $100K, with additional recurring support costs. Costs may accrue quickly due to power and cooling requirements. License options include monthly and yearly plans, and while some find it expensive, others appreciate its affordability compared to competitors. The solution is often purchased in bundles, potentially lowering costs. Despite some concerns about pricing inconvenience, it remains a key feature within NetApp storage systems.

• "The product price is reasonable."
• "It's a highly cost-effective solution"
• "The pricing can be improved."

Businesses primarily use NetApp SnapMirror for data replication, backup, and disaster recovery. They benefit from rapid recovery across sites, facilitating continuity. It's used in various deployment models, including on-premises and private clouds. Clients appreciate its ability to transfer data efficiently, especially in global infrastructures. Many rely on SnapMirror for continuous data synchronization, safeguarding data during maintenance or emergencies, and integrating seamlessly into larger environments without impacting server resources.

NetApp SnapMirror's customer service is praised for its attentiveness, although experiences vary with regional support. Technical support generally receives high marks for responsiveness and problem-solving effectiveness, with many pleased by quick resolutions and escalations handled well by US and Canada teams. Some users find the initial support levels less satisfactory, but they acknowledge the robust assistance provided when issues are critical. Users consistently express satisfaction with the quality and efficiency of NetApp SnapMirror support.

NetApp SnapMirror's initial setup is generally simple for many, with GUI assistance making it faster. Integration with systems may introduce complexity, requiring expertise for features like high availability. Users find it intuitive once familiar. Deployment often involves configuring networks and security layers, which can extend setup time. Assistance from NetApp and documentation is beneficial, making the process smooth for professionals who may complete it within hours, though thorough network preparation is crucial for timely implementation.

NetApp SnapMirror showcases excellent scalability with flexible node expansion and smooth upgrades. Users report handling variable data sizes efficiently, though large data sets may cause longer intervals. Organizations appreciate its seamless integration, supporting vast user bases and auto-scaling features. Despite some network-related limitations, SnapMirror is highly adaptable, operating without vendor lock-in. It handles considerable user growth effectively, offering impressive duplication and compression capabilities while maintaining consistent performance over extended periods without interruptions.

Many find NetApp SnapMirror stable if it's not overutilized. Some experience issues due to overworked systems or configuration problems. Positive feedback highlights SnapMirror's stability when best practices are followed. Power-related issues are attributed to firmware bugs. Users often rate stability high, citing tested and proven technology. Troubles may stem from setup errors or network issues. Proper planning and avoiding system overload are crucial. The majority rate its stability highly, with potential issues often external.