Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror compete in the data protection and replication solutions category. Dell RecoverPoint seems to have the upper hand with its continuous data protection and point-in-time recovery features.

Features: Dell RecoverPoint offers continuous data protection, remote replication, and seamless integration with VMware's Site Recovery Manager. It provides block-level duplication and automatic failover crucial for disaster recovery. NetApp SnapMirror emphasizes snapshot technology, real-time replication, and efficient data migration to ensure robust performance and stability.

Room for Improvement: Dell RecoverPoint users note the Flash-based Unisphere interface can be slow and lacks support for cascading replication. It also consumes considerable storage for journals. Enhancing compatibility with other storage systems is suggested. NetApp SnapMirror could improve data compression during transfers, simplify controller volume access, and address restrictive licensing for synchronous mirrors. Both could enhance user interfaces and platform compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell RecoverPoint is mainly on-premises but supports hybrid cloud environments. Its technical documentation is well-received, though customer support has mixed reviews. NetApp SnapMirror supports both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments with appreciated simplicity. However, some users desire better monitoring tools. Customer support is effective but could improve pricing consistency.

Pricing and ROI: Dell RecoverPoint is often perceived as costly with bundled costs in storage solutions. Licensing can be one-time, but ongoing support adds to expenses. It is valued for robust recovery capabilities. NetApp SnapMirror, part of NetApp storage bundles, is seen as cost-effective within larger solutions, though additional licenses might be prohibitive. Value perception varies based on implementation scale.