Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell AppSync vs Dell RecoverPoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (6th)
Dell RecoverPoint
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell AppSync and Dell RecoverPoint aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell AppSync is designed for Copy Data Management and holds a mindshare of 15.2%, up 10.3% compared to last year.
Dell RecoverPoint, on the other hand, focuses on Data Replication, holds 1.8% mindshare, down 2.5% since last year.
Copy Data Management
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
Syed Shahid Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage
I've worked closely with Dell since 2007. Back then, we could create a "Severity 1" case. I think they've discontinued that option. Now, you can create a "Severity 2" case. For Severity 1 issues, you can call the helpline. I've often recommended to Dell EMC Pakistan that there should be a portal option to create Severity 1 cases. Their engineers are good, but since COVID, many experienced engineers have left the company. This is a problem for every vendor, not just Dell EMC – they face challenges finding experienced technical engineers. So, while I recommend Dell EMC, sometimes they don't have the technical staff for very quick responses. In those cases, you might need to engage your account manager to find the best engineer on a Severity 1 issue.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"In terms of operational and financial benefits, in case of any disaster, it can recover."
"The most valuable features include the ease of defining contingency groups and the drag-and-drop functionality, which speeds up our application processes."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
 

Cons

"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The support is horrible."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
"While I recommend Dell EMC, it depends on your specific use case. Licensing is perpetual, meaning you buy it once."
"RecoverPoint came free as an add-on to the PowerProtect Data Manager backup software from Dell EMC."
"It is considered quite costly."
"The product is fairly priced."
"The price is moderate."
"Support is an additional subscription."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
29%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Can Dell AppSync support specific enterprise applications, such as Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, or SAP HANA?
Dell AppSync provides application awareness and ensures that backups are consistent, regardless of the database platform. It can simplify users' backup and recovery processes, allowing them to easi...
How does Dell AppSync ensure application-consistent backups for different types of applications?
Dell AppSync is a fantastic tool for achieving application-consistent backups. It uses a combination of techniques and integrations to ensure data integrity across various applications. When users ...
Can Dell AppSync leverage cloud storage for backups?
Yes, Dell AppSync offers users the flexibility to leverage cloud storage for backups. AppSync seamlessly connects to Google Cloud Storage and Azure, allowing users to store their backups in the clo...
What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The pricing of the solution. If it's SRM, VMware SRM was cheaper. Now it's subscription-based, so costs are rising. In comparison to SRM, it's cheaper.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
In the future, I would like Dell RecoverPoint to evolve as an orchestration tool that can integrate with other replication tools such as Microsoft native replication and Oracle Data Guard. Currentl...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: January 2025.
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.