Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp StorageGRID vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) comparison

NetApp and Nutanix are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nutanix is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. NetApp holds a 5.8% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Nutanix’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Read 39 Pure Storage FlashBlade reviews
  • 4,959 Views
  • 3,372 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
NetApp StorageGRID
Read 17 NetApp StorageGRID reviews
  • 2,871 Views
  • 2,871 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Read 114 Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) reviews
  • 5,461 Views
  • 3,277 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

NetApp StorageGRID and Nutanix Unified Storage compete in the enterprise storage solutions category. Nutanix appears to have the upper hand due to its high availability, scalability, and comprehensive data analytics and protection features.

Features: NetApp StorageGRID offers S3 bucket capabilities for remote access, advanced deduplication and compression, and effective backup and recovery, ideal for data-dense environments. Nutanix Unified Storage provides high availability, scalability, and smooth integration with other systems, delivering extensive data analytics and protection capabilities that appeal to users looking for a unified storage approach.

Room for Improvement: NetApp StorageGRID could improve its graphical user interface, automation, and price structure, as users report configuration complexity and integration challenges. Nutanix Unified Storage could enhance user access auditing, security features, and support for multi-platform integration, which would simplify deployment and reduce support burdens.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both NetApp StorageGRID and Nutanix Unified Storage ensure reliable deployment environments. NetApp users note occasional support needs due to documentation gaps, whereas Nutanix users appreciate the flexible integration across different environments but seek more tailored customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp StorageGRID is considered more expensive, offering savings over time by negating alternative data recovery costs. Nutanix Unified Storage is seen as more cost-effective, providing significant ROI through operational efficiency and simplified storage management, especially attractive to organizations already using Nutanix platforms.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade reduces total cost of ownership by enhancing efficiency, enabling fast restorations, and supporting diverse use cases.
Sentiment score
1.0
NetApp StorageGRID lowers costs by eliminating tape libraries and improving efficiency, offering scalability and revenue-generating opportunities for customers.
Sentiment score
6.9
Nutanix Unified Storage boosts ROI by reducing costs, enhancing uptime, scalability, and efficiency, while improving data management and productivity.
It does not require much management once you set up correctly, so it saves time, allowing an admin to focus on other work.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
For me, the biggest return on investment when using this solution is that we do not have to have much support staff to run it.
The scalability challenge with previous systems is lessened with Nutanix since we can expand by adding new hardware without needing migrations.
We are saving approximately 20% to 25% compared with the competition.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
TH
RS
reviewer2703840 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade's support is generally praised for responsiveness, despite occasional delays and communication issues, maintaining a favorable reputation.
Sentiment score
7.2
NetApp StorageGRID support is efficient but has mixed reviews due to expertise gaps and reliance on self-support in small markets.
Sentiment score
7.5
Nutanix Unified Storage customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, with high satisfaction but room for improvement in complex cases.
I would rate them an eight out of ten.
The support is done through email and is not that great, making it a very problematic area I've been dealing with for over four years.
Their technical support has been perfect lately, so I would give it a 10.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
When evaluating the technical support of NetApp StorageGRID, I would give it an eight out of ten.
I would rate the support for NetApp StorageGRID as eight out of 10.
That's due to the fact that we haven't implemented all the technical support facilities in NetApp.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
They come on the call, start troubleshooting immediately, and resolve issues effectively.
They are very knowledgeable, and if they can't solve the problem, they find the answer within a day or so.
I would give the customer service and technical support a ten out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
RE
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewerMikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
AP
Michael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
JV
AS
SG
MH
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Pure Storage FlashBlade excels in scalability, with seamless expansion, downtime-free growth, and praised support across various sectors.
Sentiment score
7.3
NetApp StorageGRID is commended for seamless, non-disruptive scalability and effective handling of large data volumes in enterprise environments.
Sentiment score
7.8
Nutanix Unified Storage offers scalable, efficient, and stable storage expansion with easy integration and intuitive licensing for diverse environments.
Pure Storage FlashBlade is scalable.
There are between 5 and 10,000 people using it in our organization.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID has been proven as we've expanded twice.
The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID rates an eight or nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
This means you don't have to buy everything upfront; you can buy what you need and add more as you grow, which is advantageous.
These three components utilize scalability tools, enabling storage addition to nodes and supporting independent, linear performance growth.
I find the scalability of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) to be excellent, and I would rate it a ten based on my clients' requirements.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewerMikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewerMichael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
AP
CG
Amarnath Charugundla - PeerSpot reviewerSaurabhShukla - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers exceptional reliability and impressive stability, featuring 99.999% uptime, seamless upgrades, and high performance.
Sentiment score
8.3
NetApp StorageGRID is valued for its reliable performance, redundancy, and effective support, with stability ratings of eight to nine.
Sentiment score
8.0
Nutanix Unified Storage is stable and reliable, offering smooth upgrades, quick issue resolution, and effective technical support.
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
My impression of the stability of NetApp StorageGRID is quite high; from one to ten, I would rate it a nine.
We experienced very little stability issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
We have not experienced these issues with Nutanix, which I attribute to the all-flash technology, the quality of their platform, and the responsiveness of the hyper-converged infrastructure.
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is very stable.
It automatically triggers tasks, causing performance issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
RE
AP
Michael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
RA
AS
reviewer2700540 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Users recommend better pricing, cloud integration, support, documentation, and analytics for Pure Storage FlashBlade, improving efficiency and compatibility.
NetApp StorageGRID's interface is complex, integration and pricing need improvement, and marketing and automated management require enhancement.
Nutanix Unified Storage requires upgrades in storage capabilities, ease of use, FTP compatibility, analytics, security, support, and pricing.
Technical support definitely needs significant improvement.
Its configuration should be easier.
One way Pure Storage FlashBlade can be improved is by having more compatibility between the FlashArray and FlashBlade.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
They need to focus on a better upgrade path with easier and more resilient upgrades.
It would be great if it could fix internal issues itself without manual intervention.
In terms of functionality, reliability, and scalability, we are satisfied with NetApp.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
The main concern is pricing, which could deter some customers; addressing this would enhance its appeal.
The system should move towards AI-driven optimization and enhance S3 object storage capabilities.
System downtime can disturb the entire ecosystem and impact all applications.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
RE
MikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewerMichael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
GP
JV
MO
SS
Amarnath Charugundla - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Pure Storage FlashBlade is costly but valued for performance, reliability, and reduced administrative overhead, justifying its premium price.
NetApp StorageGRID is expensive yet cost-effective for large-scale storage, with flexible initial investment and negotiable annual licensing.
Nutanix Unified Storage offers competitive pricing, appreciated for cost-effectiveness, but may be expensive for small businesses or specific regions.
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the past, but one benefit is that they have built-in ransomware protection.
Regarding pricing, it is okay; we needed exactly this in size, and the price was a lot lower than competitors, making it good for us.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
I'd rate the pricing eight out of ten.
It would definitely be more on the expensive side, especially if you compare it with open source solutions like Ceph.
From what I understood, it was cheaper than EMC ECS, though this was over seven years ago.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
Compared to buying three or four vendor solutions, it is much cheaper.
The cost has doubled for the same amount of data, which was a challenge when presenting use case justifications for the increased cost.
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) has definitely helped reduce our total cost of ownership.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewerMikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
AP
JV
Michael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
TH
RS
NL
 

Valuable Features

Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with ease of use, fast performance, scalability, seamless integration, and efficient storage features.
NetApp StorageGRID offers S3 access, rapid backup, deduplication, scalability, management ease, and integration, enhancing usability and data retrieval.
Nutanix Unified Storage offers scalability, efficiency, robust security, seamless cloud integration, and simplifies IT management, enhancing storage reliability.
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
The best features of Pure Storage FlashBlade include better throughput and better performance.
Pure Storage FlashBlade's scalability is one of the most valuable features, and importantly, it always works, allowing for seamless upgrades.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
The feature of NetApp StorageGRID that has significantly improved data storage management for my customers is the value of the S3 API because it allows developers who are not infrastructure-oriented to use it and write code against it.
NetApp StorageGRID is a great alternative to AWS S3 buckets.
The scalability is very effective for our customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the NetApp StorageGRID report
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is appreciated for its fault tolerance and redundancy at the cluster level, which ensures reliable storage of files, folders, and other information accessible on the client side.
The cybersecurity features of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) when dealing with unstructured data, such as ransomware threats, provide the ability to detect and back up block-based storage, allowing me to restore repositories or sets of block storage with one button click, which is automatic.
My experience with using Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) for data-intensive workloads is that we have many SQL Servers and they perform much better than they did when we used hybrid converged previously.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report
RE
Parul-Patel - PeerSpot reviewerMikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
AP
GP
JV
reviewer2700540 - PeerSpot reviewer
AE
TH
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sponsored
Ranking in File and Object Storage
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (15th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (8th)
NetApp StorageGRID
Ranking in File and Object Storage
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Ranking in File and Object Storage
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
114
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (5th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (3rd), Public Cloud Storage Services (5th), NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.7%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.8%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)3.0%
Pure Storage FlashBlade5.7%
NetApp StorageGRID5.8%
Other85.5%
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades
In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
Read full review
Michael Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
Has reduced storage costs and improved snapshot management for large data workloads
The advanced features of NetApp StorageGRID which our upper management wouldn't agree to use, include the S3 feature. We are heavy into AWS, and my thoughts were to develop a small dev environment or even a POC environment on-prem. That's still up in the air as we continue on. Currently, AI has taken over everything with a focus on AI. The upgrades of NetApp StorageGRID present a challenge. It's a rolling upgrade, node by node. At one point, one node would not upgrade. The positive aspect is that it didn't take down the entire environment. The environment remained functional on two different versions. The scalability of NetApp StorageGRID has been proven as we've expanded twice. We started with six or seven nodes and have grown to 15 nodes. It does take time for synchronization to complete. From what I've seen, it took a couple of months for it all to sync up once adding nodes. However, it was transparent. It captured the addition and performed effectively, all happening in the background, steadily and surely.
Read full review
Amarnath Charugundla - PeerSpot reviewer
Unified management and cost-effectiveness lead to positive experiences and future savings
Improvement is necessary wherein the memory or storage should not breach 90%, because if breached, it becomes unmanageable. We have to set alerts or CPU triggering for 95% for the first warning. Other activities on nodes or file systems should be properly maintained. We must monitor the dashboard for P1, P2 alerts in the Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) file share system including SMB, NFS, objects, and blocks. Attention should be maintained for any alerts such as CPU, memory, and RAM alerts, as exceeding these creates issues within teams. If triggered to 95% and forgotten, it crosses the SLA breach, causing disturbances to application, web, and platform teams. Continuous monitoring on the Nutanix dashboard is essential. Even a highly experienced person in Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) cannot provide a 10 rating out of 10 because it is a vast system. I would rate it eight from my perspective.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
28%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise30
Large Enterprise63
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The pricing of Pure Storage FlashBlade is expensive compared to other products I used from other companies in the pas...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
I believe there is not much improvement needed because they have everything we need, but the interface is a little bi...
See all answers
What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?
The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to rest...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?
As an administrator, I was not involved in the pricing of NetApp StorageGRID. From what I understood, it was cheaper ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?
The upgrades of NetApp StorageGRID present challenges. It's a rolling upgrade, node by node. At one point, one node w...
See all answers
What do you like most about Nutanix Unified Storage?
Nutanix has excellent product documentation available on their portals, written in simple, easy-to-understand language.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Unified Storage?
It is very cost-effective compared to the traditional environment. With new hardware, it's a long-term investment but...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nutanix Unified Storage?
To improve Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), cost is always an issue for every company, especially when we talk about la...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 19% of the time
Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 11% of the time
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 11% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 9% of the time
Scality RING vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Scality RING vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 2% of the time
More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 28% of the time
Dell ObjectScale vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Dell ObjectScale vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 22% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 21% of the time
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 6% of the time
Qumulo vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Qumulo vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 1% of the time
More NetApp StorageGRID Competitors
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Compared 14% of the time
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Logo
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Compared 10% of the time
MinIO vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Logo
MinIO vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Compared 8% of the time
IBM Storage Fusion vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Logo
IBM Storage Fusion vs Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Compared 4% of the time
More Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashBlade
October 2025
Pure Storage FlashBlade reportDownload Pure Storage FlashBlade product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID
October 2025
NetApp StorageGRID reportDownload NetApp StorageGRID product report
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
October 2025
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) reportDownload Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Storage GRID
Nutanix Files Storage, Nutanix Volumes Block Storage, Nutanix Objects Storage
 

Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Pure Storage

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

NetApp

Nutanix Unified Storage provides high availability and seamless cloud platform integration, ensuring robust redundancy, scalability, and streamlined management. It supports hybrid cloud connectivity, enhancing storage security and performance.

Nutanix Unified Storage is designed for effective data protection across block, file, and object storage, offering features like ransomware detection and a centralized management interface through Prism Central. Users gain improved SLAs and IT cost savings through its efficient performance. Despite its user-friendly interface, there is a demand for enhanced security measures such as Multi-Factor Authentication and DLP. While its resilience is notable, users seek improvements in protocol compatibility, storage capabilities, pricing, and support processes.

What are the most important features of Nutanix Unified Storage?
  • User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies storage management and monitoring.
  • High Availability: Ensures continuous operation and reliability.
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Compatible with platforms like Azure and AWS.
  • Robust Redundancy: Protects data against hardware failures.
  • Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing data storage needs.
  • Ransomware Detection: Enhances data protection measures.
What benefits and ROI might users find in reviews?
  • Improved SLAs: Increased service reliability and performance.
  • IT Cost Savings: Reduces expenses through efficient resource use.
  • Enhanced Security: Stronger data protection and reduced risk.
  • Centralized Management: Easier control and monitoring from one dashboard.

Industries implement Nutanix Unified Storage for tasks such as file storage, database performance improvement, and storage solution consolidation. Companies deploying virtual machines, securing against ransomware, connecting hybrid clouds, and backing up data find it useful. It supports workloads like Citrix VDI, Kubernetes, and research data, assisting many organizations migrating from legacy storage for better cost efficiency and reduced data center footprints.

Nutanix
 

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
ASE, DARZ GmbH
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
September 2025
Free Report: NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetApp StorageGRID vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.