Top 10 Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

72 reviews
98% willing to recommend

Top Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, and Zadara. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, simplified management, and robust data protection, providing businesses with efficient, reliable storage solutions that ensure smooth operations and safeguard critical information without complexity.

Nutanix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Nutanix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Red Hat Ceph Storage

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Ceph Storage

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Ceph Storage, known for flexible scalability and cost-effectiveness, caters to organizations needing customizable, large-scale deployments. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage with superior integration and data management capabilities suits enterprises prioritizing ease of use and seamless hybrid cloud operations.

Download Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report

Pricing

Red Hat Ceph Storage has a higher setup cost, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Ceph Storage has a higher setup cost, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct attracts tech buyers seeking cost-efficiency and straightforward support. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage offers versatility through extensive features and seamless integration. Microsoft focuses on simplicity and cost-effectiveness, while Nutanix caters to complex environments with robust performance and integration capabilities.

Download Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct generally incurs lower setup costs compared to Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), highlighting a cost-effective edge in initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct generally incurs lower setup costs compared to Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), highlighting a cost-effective edge in initial deployment.

Zadara

4.4 out of 5

Zadara

4.4 out of 5

Zadara is praised for its pricing and multi-cloud flexibility. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) offers superior integrations and robust security. For cost-effectiveness and easy scaling, Zadara stands out, whereas NUS's comprehensive features and long-term ROI make it attractive despite higher costs.

Download Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs. Zadara Report

Pricing

Zadara offers a competitive setup cost with a pay-as-you-go model, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) requires a higher initial investment but includes more extensive support features.

View comparison

Pricing

Zadara offers a competitive setup cost with a pay-as-you-go model, while Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) requires a higher initial investment but includes more extensive support features.

LINBIT SDS

1 out of 5

LINBIT SDS

1 out of 5

LINBIT keeps Linux systems up and running. As the developers of DRBD® software (www.linbit.com), LINBIT has led the way in high availability since 2001. DRBD has been included in the Linux kernel since version 2.6.33 (2009), has been deployed on all major Linux distributions and is fully compatible with systems, applications, devices and services.

View comparison

Related categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

All-Flash Storage

Public Cloud Storage Services